Sequels that shouldn't be

Mar 28, 2009 18:33

I want to see the new Crank movie for the sole purpose of finding out how to survive a free fall from a couple hundred feet on to a car.

Leave a comment

Comments 11

_stuman_ March 28 2009, 23:00:34 UTC
When my brother first told me there was a sequel, despite everything that transpired in the first movie, all I could think was "That's bullshit".

Reply

max_zero March 29 2009, 17:02:14 UTC
"But after they remove his heart and replace it with an electronic temporary one, Chev wakes up and kills the medics."

Ahhahahahahhahahaha.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

black_cracka March 29 2009, 01:50:23 UTC
Movies like this are what happens when kids don't pay attention in physics class....He clearly should have been liquidated since he had more than enough time to reach terminal velocity.

I'll bet his phone still works too!

Reply

_stuman_ March 29 2009, 01:52:23 UTC
And as Mythbusters proved, you can't hear anything during freefall.

Also, seeing that scene again, the green screen is pretty obvious (terrible).

Reply


lessthanbry March 29 2009, 19:53:07 UTC
If you didn't like Crank, there's something wrong with you.

Reply

black_cracka March 29 2009, 21:38:11 UTC
I loved crank, I just want to know how dumb Hollywood thinks the average viewer is.

There is absolutely no explanation possible that will satisfy me as to how he could have survived that fall. Even if they claim that he was almighty god it will not be sufficient.

Reply

lessthanbry March 29 2009, 22:48:48 UTC
Why do they need an explanation?

Reply

black_cracka March 29 2009, 23:08:13 UTC
So that things make sense, there needs to be some sort of continuity beyond character names if this is a sequel.

Reply


Only believe ifrostbite March 30 2009, 02:49:48 UTC
The car had a trampoline in it. Duh.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up