Today was the first day of the
Algebraic Biology conference
at RISC in
Hagenberg. The talks on tap were quite a mix of biology and mathematics. This is, of course, what they were aiming for, but it is certainly different than anything I have ever seen. There was also a pretty even mix of 'published paper' presentations and 'tutorials', the former
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Let me ask you this; does it seem like one particular field is trying to assert their prominence over the other is the quest of new research? Or, is there mutual agreement between the CS/Math and Biology parties that more most be done to incorporate their research together and forget about their differences?
My fear is that the Biology side may be still aspiring to assert their dominance over the Math/CS folk in my reading of various academic journals and articles as of lately, as positive as these publications appear thus far.
Reply
Reply
In any case, it sounds like you had a pretty good time.
Reply
If I may say so, I think that in general the mathematicians were better at making their talks accessible. Over three days I heard 29 out of 31 talks. There were a couple of biologically-bent talks that were much easier than the majority of the math/cs presentations, but I would say that the ratio of approachable math talks to overall bio talks was higher. (Naturally, take that with a grain of salt: You know my math background, and I've heard more organized discussion of biology over the past 10 days, I think, than the entirety of my life leading up to that point ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment