Warrior isn't in the female progression

Apr 20, 2005 00:40

The traditional female life cycle is Maiden, Mother, Crone. Some wymyn want to add a fourth "Warrior" stage. This is silly. According to the CMA Beltaine ritual, the stages of the male life cycle are Warrior, Chieftain, and Sage. I've heard some disagreement about Chieftain, but Warrior seems pretty standard. Now, take Artemis - the "virgin ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

opheliasavalon April 20 2005, 06:07:28 UTC
Last LJ check while J is getting ready for bed brings me to this post (yes I am an addict). More in-depth thoughts may come when I have more than 5 seconds, but I always felt that Warrior wasn't a life stage in a woman, more like a smaller thread that weaves through the other stages. Not all women pass through a Warrior phase. However, some Maidens have Warrior aspects and most Mothers will have a Warrior as Protector aspect. So I'd tend to agree that it isn't a phase in the female progression, but can be a part of the others. Just like the Mother stage is reflected as Fatherhood in the Chieftain stage. If I think about this more, maybe I'd be inclined to say that the 3 male stages have threads in the 3 female stages & vice versa.

Reply


seridia April 20 2005, 06:18:48 UTC
I don't know of any scholars who claim that Artemis is a figure dealing with the "feminine" areas or aspects. She, like Athena (the woman of the city) are understood to be acting in a male aspect of the world (hence the fact that they are virginal). People long ago could understand this concept, I'm not sure why we're having such problems with it.

I don't think that warrior fits into the female life cycle, but that doesn't mean women can't explore a warrior side. It's just not part of that trinity.

Reply


neohippie April 20 2005, 13:38:13 UTC
Well, I always thought the "Triple Goddess" idea was artificial and too rigid. What was the guy that first thought up the triple goddess? Was it Robert Graves? Anyway, it's not a pre-Christian pagan concept ( ... )

Reply


saveena May 16 2005, 18:17:40 UTC
Very interesting subject! I'm sort of butting in and visiting from greeneyedpagan's page. Hopefully my two cents won't be totally unwanted.

I've always associated my self image with Artemis and Athena, but never liked the virginal aspect of their natures. It just seems so wrong to take something that joyous and fun away from women who are physically strong. Is it an attempt to control them? Sort of like saying, "you can be warriors, but not lovers?" I love the idea of being a seductress and a warrior. And I believe that when I find him my mate will be warrior and father.

Reply

blue_jay May 16 2005, 20:51:03 UTC
Your two cents are totally wanted. I was trying to say something controversial to start a discussion.

On the other hand, you didn't disagree with me. How can I argue if you won't disagree? :P

The Greeks seem to have very narrow, and usually misogynistic, ideas of their gods.

Reply

saveena May 16 2005, 22:18:13 UTC
I can disagree just so that we have something to argue about. Would that make you happy? ;-)

Reply


lady_librarian May 27 2005, 05:35:38 UTC
Greetings! It was awesome meeting you guys. Hope to see you again soon. Blessed Be. ~ Steph

Reply


Leave a comment

Up