FIC: Tangent

Mar 23, 2006 23:41

Title: Tangent
Author: rebecca
Pairing: Joshua/Stephen
Rating: NC-17
Summary: You want to know, don't you?
Warnings: BDSM, hard-core.
Notes: This was originally intended to be part of Right Angle. Due to various reasons, I decided it didn't fit in the story and took it out. However, I liked it enough to keep it around, and I'm apparently incapable ( Read more... )

geometry, joshua/stephen, ncis fic, kink

Leave a comment

Comments 38

because you should have the joy of comment notifications sandersyager March 24 2006, 08:01:52 UTC
I'm glad this gets to see the light of day. I'm really taken with Tony's responses to all of it, and Joshua's responses to Tony. You get chocolate.

Reply

Re: because you should have the joy of comment notifications blueraccoon March 24 2006, 08:06:05 UTC
mmmmchocolate. thanks!

Reply


one_side2002 March 24 2006, 08:45:56 UTC
I like it a lot... and you know while I was reading it, I found myself almost wishing that David and Tony would work out, cause I love Joshua and Stephen as Tony's friends and I am not sure if Gibbs could deal with this close friendship...

anyway, just a random thought...

take care
val

Reply

blueraccoon March 24 2006, 08:53:06 UTC
hm. interesting, and not something I'd really thought about before. I'll keep that in mind.

Thanks!

Reply

kaleecat March 25 2006, 05:54:52 UTC
I've been thinking along the same line as Val. not sure that gibbs would handle the friendship tony has going with stephen in particular. And that is a big draw to the series for me - that the friendship tony has formed with stephen in particular, but joshua also, is so ... natural. Its also good for him on just a companionship level like when he first went to dinner with them.

But then stephen & joshua are so well created I would happily read stories just about them & their lives, their friends.

Reply

_minxy_ April 13 2006, 04:05:58 UTC
Just read this (and loved it) and I love that people are considering David and Tony... I think as far as Tony in a relationship and still friends with Stephen and Joshua, being with another serious Dom could lead to conflicts with Joshua. It's not all about the four of them in a group, though, it's partly about how much Tony needs to be dominated, and David is much less than Gibbs (IMO) in the alpha male race.

Doesn't mean I don't want to see more of all of it, though. So much to explore! And this was one helluva intro for Tony. Lucky guy. *g*

Reply


Tangent ksl2025 March 24 2006, 11:28:07 UTC
That was intense. Hell of an introduction for Tony.

Reply

Re: Tangent blueraccoon March 25 2006, 07:49:47 UTC
There's a reason it didn't make it into the finished story :)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: Wowzer blueraccoon March 25 2006, 07:50:17 UTC
mmmm. cheesecake :D thank you.

Reply


teddibear March 24 2006, 14:04:14 UTC
Please please please tell me you are going to continue and let us see what Stephen has in store for Tony. I've been imagining them together since day one and while I told you, I don't do BDSM, because of the way you write, this was HOT. Stephen and Joshua are such fabulous OMCs and I love the way they interact with each other AND Tony. Awww. So please tell me there will be more with Stephen AND Tony.

It may not have fit Right Angles but I'm damn glad you wrote it. Yum.

I'm starting to like your kink Rebecca. Bad girl you are.

*smooch*

Oh and I need a cold shower now. *guh*

Reply

teddibear March 24 2006, 14:05:35 UTC
BTW-there's a but in there before the because. Not that I don't do BDSM because of the way you write, but that I'm enjoying this BECAUSE of the way you write. Does that make ANY sense? Shit. last time I give feedback at six am. Meh. *facedesk*

Reply

blueraccoon March 25 2006, 07:53:44 UTC
*g* I'm so glad you liked this. There's more with Stephen and Tony, but I don't think I'll ever pair them.

Reply

teddibear March 27 2006, 01:59:36 UTC
Ok maybe not pair em perse cuz I like Tony and David but just write the sequel cuz I want to see Tony and Stephen together. Cuz it's HOT. *snicker*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up