Comments | bobbykins: ann coulter-hitler

bobbykins

ann coulter-hitler

Jun 09, 2006 00:09

( Read more... )

Comments 18

(The comment has been removed)

bobbykins June 9 2006, 04:35:26 UTC

yeah i would, but i would make sure to do her in the ass, so it would really hurt

rockerdude96 June 9 2006, 17:13:51 UTC

Robert, Robert, Robert. You sadden me. I thought after taking a class on politics you would know better. Do you even know who the Jersey Girls are? And no, I'm not defending Ann Coulter's methods (she lacks all subtlety), but she has a point. Imagine if you were in a tragic car accident, lost your parents, whatever. You then use the media attention you get to voice your political views and people, for some strange reason, think you're an expert on whatever topic you're discussing (which you're not). That's what the 4 9/11 widows from New Jersey did. And guess what? The media loved them. One news report even described them as "four intrepid New Jersey housewives who had brought an administration to it's knees". So Ann Coulter may be mean, but mean-ness doesn't necessarily mean incorrect. Second point I have to make: what does any of this have to do with Hitler? Hitler wasn't a fan of any religion, so how can you equate someone who's talking about tht ungodliness of others as a Hitler-esque person. Third point: No offense, but you ( ... )

bobbykins June 9 2006, 21:58:26 UTC

response to 1- the media attention they got was not to voice their political views, but it was to make people open their eyes ,which they did. now 9-11 is an open book and nobody really knows what happened. and they arent self described "intrepid New Jersey housewives who had brought an administration to it's knees", if they were then yeah, but that was somebody else. response to 2- i used hitler because AC is a psychotic, iuntolerant, bitch. resonse to 3-im just asking christians to actually practice as much as they preach. response to 4- nobody personallly, but all those religious "fanatics", u know the ones who protest in the street and tell all people who sin that they are going to hell, which is a sin in itself, according to christianity only god/jesus will be the judge. response to 5- people dont take me seriously anyways, y not give them all a laugh.

rockerdude96 June 10 2006, 01:36:59 UTC

I've actually never met a "fanatic", have you?

bobbykins June 10 2006, 01:49:19 UTC

yes, have u ever been to gainesville, lol

Thread 12

rockerdude96 June 9 2006, 17:14:26 UTC

I forgot to compliment you on your Photoshopping. It's actually pretty amusing.

bobbykins June 9 2006, 21:51:58 UTC

i never used it before, and thought it was kinda funny

rockerdude96 June 9 2006, 18:06:52 UTC

Sorry to post so many times, but I did a little bit more web-surfing to try to respond to your post with as much info as I could find. According to the AC herself, the book isn't actually about how ungodly liberals are (despite the title), it's more about how liberalism has become it's own religion. "It is a book about liberalism, our official state religion. Liberalism is a doctrine with a specific set of tenets that can be discussed, just like other religions." Okay, I think I'm done bothering you for today.

bobbykins June 9 2006, 22:01:41 UTC

lol, the self review made me luagh, i really would like to slap her, she makes herself seem so pretentious.

luckycharm08 June 10 2006, 03:35:08 UTC

are you coming on the mission trip this year?
UMARMY, ofcourse. lol.
i hope so.
last year was so fun... ORANGE!
lol.