Pie chart misuse reaches new level of awfulness

Nov 30, 2009 14:16

I've seen some terrible graphs in my time, but this is just ridiculous.

Cut to protect delicate eyes from graphic scene of misuse )

Leave a comment

Comments 29

chezghost November 30 2009, 14:55:21 UTC
Source: Opinions

the 'Dynamic' bit is a typo!

Reply


beckyc November 30 2009, 15:02:48 UTC
Ow ow ow, my eyes are bleeding!

Why didn't I heed your warning? I thought I could cope with anything, but that really is the limit!

Reply


martinskidmore November 30 2009, 16:28:14 UTC
Could people support more than one candidate? If so, the figures may not be wrong - but putting them into a pie chart was an appalling idea. Also the modern tendency to tilt pie graphs to make them 3-D makes the segments at the bottom look larger than equally sized ones at the top, which defeats the whole point of such a chart.

Reply

boyofbadgers November 30 2009, 17:35:06 UTC
Oh, I didn't think the figures were wrong, it's the (presumably kneejerk) use of the pie chart that was upsetting.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: BSc. Econ. Hons IR boyofbadgers November 30 2009, 17:41:57 UTC
My film knowledge is so rub that I can't even work out how that would be plausible!

Reply


pippaalice November 30 2009, 18:36:40 UTC
How is this possible?

Reply

The rat control the cook! boyofbadgers November 30 2009, 19:24:59 UTC
Well, I suspect what happened was that everyone polled was asked which candidates they would back, rather than which candidate. So they could pick more than one, which is why the pie chart seems to show 193%, which is why they should have used a bar chart instead.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up