Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Jul 17, 2005 10:38

Meh. Definitely the worst Harry Potter at all. I don't think it was even comparable to the others.

=(

Edit I'm reading it again, and I have to say it's better the second time around. But the seventh book had better kick ass!

harry potter, books

Leave a comment

Comments 8

divechick July 17 2005, 14:44:44 UTC
yeah...

the fifth book was really good so I thought this one would be as good or better, but it was just kind of mediocre.

Reply


five_x_five July 17 2005, 22:08:45 UTC
I'll have to give it a second go. It's entertaining enough to read, but if you really think about it, it falls short of the others. Which is a shame.

Reply


anonymous July 17 2005, 22:14:03 UTC
Just because nothing extremely dramatic is happening doesn't make it bad. Also, it's nice to see them finally grow up (see: Dating), though I must say I've never heard the word 'snog' used so many times before. I'm only halfway through (taking it slow, because book 7 is at least 2 years away) but it's not at all bad. Heh, I'm starting to like the word 'snog'.

-Charlie

p.s. Who was the Charlie you mentioned a post or two ago? Ordering salads?

Reply

break_of_day July 18 2005, 00:54:35 UTC
Er, that was you. You bought me Caesar salad wraps slash gave me half of your turkey wraps quite often, and I should pay you back, but I have no idea how much I owe you by now.

Reply


anonymous July 18 2005, 14:40:56 UTC
Oh, you were talking about school, and not about some dinner you had attended recently...I need to stop asking questions after 10 at night

Reply


anonymous July 18 2005, 14:41:30 UTC
No payments required

Reply

break_of_day July 18 2005, 17:59:02 UTC
Have you dropped off the face of the earth? No one's seen you since the end of school, not even at that concert thing that I thought you'd be at.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up