Listen, bitches, do NOT start putting ideas into the brat's head about getting his paintings back. There will be repercussions for anyone encouraging him in stupidity.
You're cute when you try to tell us what to do. We are simply trying to tell him he has a right to want them back. N has no right to keep them! And really, what are you going to do? Bounce to each of our repective states (or countries) and beat us? And I know you are a smart man and can recognize that may be incentive for us to keep going! *grins* And lastly, I don't think it's any of us bitches who put the idea in his head.
At the very least, you are encouraging him to get himself in trouble.
How is it encouragment when he already wanted the paintings back? We are simply saying "Yes Justin you have a right to want your work back." I don't see any of us saying "Go get a crowbar and break his trunk open, see for yourself." Or anything like that. I would never encourage Justin to do anything that could get him in trouble with the law. That's just stupid. We are simply supporting his feelings of wanting N to pay and cough up his work. Not a damn thing wrong with that!
Don't doubt that I have my methods of retribution.
Nope, I wouldn't do that. Anyone knows the first rule when the lawyers get involved is NO CONTACT outside of very carefully defined parameters. Nasty would use the paintings, if he has them at all and even if he doesn't, to string Justin along. And Justin got the best one back. He's lucky he got that.
Doesn't Justin take photos of all his art work for his portfolio? Wouldn't that be proof enough, after this is all behind you both, that if those pieces of work are found that they belong to Justin?
Well, first of all, Justin is very smart so I would trust that he wouldn't do anything stupid. Secondly, I did say he shouldn't do anything while the legal matter is pending. My hope is that your attorney can actually scare or intimidate N into turning over Justin's paintings if they're still in the fucker's possession. Third, based on Justin's comments in the comm and to some of the other voyeurs he seems well aware that it is not in his best interest to go after N (break into his office, etc.).
Comments 15
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
We are simply trying to tell him he has a right to want them back. N has no right to keep them!
And really, what are you going to do? Bounce to each of our repective states (or countries) and beat us?
And I know you are a smart man and can recognize that may be incentive for us to keep going! *grins*
And lastly, I don't think it's any of us bitches who put the idea in his head.
Reply
Don't doubt that I have my methods of retribution.
Reply
How is it encouragment when he already wanted the paintings back? We are simply saying "Yes Justin you have a right to want your work back."
I don't see any of us saying "Go get a crowbar and break his trunk open, see for yourself."
Or anything like that. I would never encourage Justin to do anything that could get him in trouble with the law. That's just stupid.
We are simply supporting his feelings of wanting N to pay and cough up his work. Not a damn thing wrong with that!
Don't doubt that I have my methods of retribution.
I don't doubt you do Mr. Kinney.
Reply
Nope, I wouldn't do that. Anyone knows the first rule when the lawyers get involved is NO CONTACT outside of very carefully defined parameters. Nasty would use the paintings, if he has them at all and even if he doesn't, to string Justin along. And Justin got the best one back. He's lucky he got that.
Reply
And just as rare.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment