I'm doing a profiling course at the moment, and you may remember that I have had a passing interest in the case for many years. And now I got to profile it!
was not a female
anonymous
February 9 2010, 00:50:59 UTC
If it was someone the child new then there would not be marks on the body from a stun gun (believed to be). Also what was done to the child in question was something that was well planned and malicious. For some reason the DA had a hard on for the family and didn't concentrate the investigation anywhere else. 9 months after the ramsey murder there was another attack on a young female, to be the same age as JonBenet. Both young girls attended a dance studio together. This crime was well planned and I don't believe this is the first time he did that. The ramseys were never home. On the 24th of December they were gone attending a dinner party at the whites house at 5:00pm. The killer, who I believe to be knowledgeable in electronics, could have walked that house until they got home and then hid in the basement until they were all asleep and they didn't know it. That is my opinion anyways. I am studying the case for my criminal investigation class. So I have done a lot of research on this.
Im sorry but this is complete bollocks. The motive is missing for a start. And please don't give me the wet bed nonsense, because her bed was dry, and it had not been changed, as fibres from the clothes she had been wearing that night were found in her bed
( ... )
Comments 4
Burke's voice was never on the tape.
You seemed more interested in physical evidence than the psychology of the killer.
When you finally see the real killer, you will realize the greater depth and complexity of people.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment