I'm having no luck

Jan 27, 2007 22:35

I'm in a basic sets and logic course, and we're working through induction. I'm supposed to prove: (∀n ∈ N)(Σ r.r! = (n+1)! - 1), where the lower bound is r=1, and the upper is n, and N is the natural numbers. The only thing is that I have no idea how r.r! works. Any help I'd appreciate.

Leave a comment

Comments 9

fiberpunk January 28 2007, 04:33:15 UTC
What does r.r! even mean?

Reply

where_was_i January 28 2007, 05:33:18 UTC
It may be a misprint in the book. But my first thought was something like (1.1)! for r=1 or (6.6)! for r=6, but I think the only function that covers that is well beyond the scope of the book.

Reply

fiberpunk January 28 2007, 05:50:54 UTC
I haven't seen notation like that before. If your book hasn't defined it, it's probably worth shooting an email to your instructor.

Reply


mathic January 28 2007, 08:18:06 UTC
I'm amused how no one else has thought of this yet, multiplication dot instead of period dot.

A few examples just to check?

nLeft hand sideRight hand side
111
21 + 4 = 56 - 1= 5
31 + 4 + 18 = 2324 - 1 = 23

(hehehe, I just learned how to put tables on webpages... so coooooolllllzzzz)

So I think it's safe to assume it's a product dot rebelling against the man

Reply


lsur January 28 2007, 10:24:39 UTC
r times factorial r

Try wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permutation as well as the article on factorials (which is probably overkill). Looks like you have to rearrange the permutation formula.

Reply


where_was_i January 28 2007, 17:28:06 UTC
Yeah, thanks, everyone. I figured it out after playing aroud with it a little. The dot is supposed to be a multiplication sign.

Reply

lsur January 28 2007, 18:08:53 UTC
That's a common usage, here at least. Saves cluttering the page with 'x's.

Reply

filosophicphool January 28 2007, 20:03:16 UTC
alt + 249 = ∙

Reply

where_was_i February 1 2007, 21:13:13 UTC
Hah, I know the 'dot' to mean 'multiply'. I'm just used to seeing it in the middle of the text row, not where a decimal or persiod would be. Thanks, though!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up