Leave a comment

Comments 29

madwriter November 23 2006, 17:18:18 UTC
This became one of the extraordinarily rare occasions where I liked the movie better than the book.

I do want to pick up his new one, as it's another subject I'm interested in--I just hope he actually uses quotation marks this time. The lack of them has always made it more difficult for me to read even a book I enjoy.

Reply

Can't Spell... calico_reaction November 23 2006, 17:36:41 UTC
I'll drink to that. In terms of favorites, I think Fight Club was a stronger movie than book, and same for LOTR (which is blasphemy for some people, sorry *grins*).

Ah, lack of quotations...I can work with it in a short story, even though it bothers me, cause short stories are short. But for a whole novel? Ouch. Granted, there was hardly any dialogue in this one, but still...my poor eyes... :)

Reply

Re: Can't Spell... gruyere November 23 2006, 18:45:19 UTC
I agree on LotR - I saw the films first and loved them, but found the novels to be terribly dull. The movie was essentially the "abridged 'Good Parts' version," to borrow a phrase from William Goldman.

Reply

Re: Can't Spell... calico_reaction November 23 2006, 20:35:30 UTC
Same here. I saw the first film four times, read the entire trilogy the following summer, and then saw the rest of the films as they were released. Had I not had "Fellowship" engrained in my brain, I don't think I could've gotten through the book itself.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

calico_reaction November 23 2006, 17:49:41 UTC
Thanks for the rec! I'll keep it in mind. :)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

calico_reaction November 23 2006, 20:35:59 UTC
Ah, reccing doesn't take much time at all. :) Thanks again!

Reply


gruyere November 23 2006, 18:44:17 UTC
Hated Cold Mountain. HATED it.

Reply

calico_reaction November 23 2006, 20:36:45 UTC
I can't say I hated it, but I didn't like it either. But I'm glad to hear others had problems and I'm not an oddball. :)

Reply

gruyere November 23 2006, 20:40:08 UTC
I disliked it enough that I included it on my list of "Notably Lousy Books" at the bottom of my 2005 tally.

Reply

calico_reaction November 23 2006, 22:10:35 UTC
Interesting. I wasn't fond of Haunted either, because it drove home the fact that every book is the same voice, Palahnuik's voice. When you consider the number of short stories in that book, and each short is a different narrator, there should've been some variation, but there wasn't. That realization alone ripped the gloss of his prose away, and I started noticing more and more of his flaws. Oh well. :) I'll still read his books when they come out. :)

Reply


postcard_life November 23 2006, 22:29:03 UTC
I did like Cold Mountain, though it seems that I am the only one. I remember starting it and not being able to get into it. Then I picked it back up and enjoyed it considerably. That was right before the movie came out, about three years ago, so I don't remember exactly why I liked it. I'm glad I started keeping a list of the books I read, so now maybe I can keep better track of the books I love.

Do you like the booksnob community? I just dumped book_club for booksalon. I'm trying to find a good place for reading recommendations, since I can't rely on you exclusively. :) Someone on my friends list starting a book club, but no one ever posts to it. I've been disappointed in most of the reading/book communities on livejournal.

Reply

calico_reaction November 24 2006, 00:47:19 UTC
I remember you really liking the book, so I figured I'd enjoy it. But it just didn't jive with me, unfortunately. Oh well, it happens. :)

I don't read the posts at booksnob, because a long time ago when I did, every one seemed bent on making introduction posts where they affirmed how much they hated science fiction (which is blatantly stated in the user info). Pissed me the hell off: I don't mind them excluding a certain genre, but it was hypocritical in that if the book was considered literary, like 1984 or Brave New World or Never Let Me Go, they'd discuss it, and all I wanted to do was yell, "THAT'S SCIENCE FICTION, DAMN IT!!"

Anyway, you obviously know why it pisses me off. I don't consider them snobby in any other regard, but it all depends on your tastes. Check them out for a while, see what you think.

One of the comms I do follow is bookish. You may find recs there that you enjoy. OH!! Here's a good one: thedailybook. Every day a poll is posted about whether people have read a certain book or not, and the comments are for discussion. That might be a ( ... )

Reply

bookshare eeyorelovers November 26 2006, 16:31:21 UTC
Sorry to jump in the conversation but I thought you might like bookshare. And please forgive me if that link didn't work. I've done it a few times but I have to look up how to do it everytime. Anyway bookshare was one of the featured comm about a month or two ago and got more traffic. Now there are posts everyday and you might be interested in the reccomendations they give..

Reply

calico_reaction November 26 2006, 20:04:38 UTC
Here's another comm recommended to me that you may enjoy. :)

bookshare

Reply


_starkiss November 24 2006, 00:41:48 UTC
Followed you here from Bookish...

When there is dialogue, Frazier does the “artsy” thing by NOT USING QUOTATION MARKS.

For the love of everything pure and good, what is WITH this trend? I have yet to see it in fiction where the lack of quotations do ANYTHING save for annoy the hell out of me.

I have to agree. It drives me crazy when writers do this and only a very good book can rise above it, IMO. I adored Cold Mountain, though. I loved the incredible details, and I thought Inman was a compelling character, at once shy and self-assured. But I can definitely see your points.

Reply

calico_reaction November 24 2006, 00:49:41 UTC
I'm glad there's people who enjoy it. Obviously, lots of people did for it to get the acclaim it did. :) I guess I'm desensitized to what the writer was trying to do, cause I can see where it had the potential to be powerful.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up