Preemptive Furry Vengence

Jan 19, 2004 02:24

Really, I doubt that anyone but myself is going to have any interest in this little soliloquy. Please realize that all the blathering gibberish that follows is based on the supreme arrogance: A) that my novels will eventually be published, and B) that anyone will care ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

z0mbarella January 19 2004, 00:18:13 UTC
Haha. The topic came up in conversation last nite, and I said, "I know these people that complain about furries an awful lot, don't know why . . ."

I guess now I know. And knowing is half the battle.

Reply

calypsomyst January 19 2004, 09:58:48 UTC
Oh, if only it were that easy, but Ris and I were attacking furries before these characters were even created. Mostly it's because they are a walking, yiffing example of abuse of technology...without the internet, Darwinism would have prevented these freaks from breeding and existing long ago. But there they are. Also, I get annoyed because not only are they sexual deviants, they are rude sexual deviants who publicize their unnatural tendencies and demand that they be accepted as normal. Imagine when some mother and her kid walk past a hotel and see a Furry convention, and the poor mother has to explain. Normal, decent people keep their sex acts to themselves, they don't assult others with it.

Reply

z0mbarella January 19 2004, 10:27:10 UTC
Hmm. I think I have heard the same arguments as a justification for homophobia.

I don't see how you guys are exposed to these people so often, except in Ris's below mentioned porn hunts. I never really see or hear about them.

Anywho, I think that the Furry convention would be easier to explain than an anime convention :)

Reply

calypsomyst January 19 2004, 11:26:08 UTC
Ah, but there is a vast difference between homophobia and not wanting someone else's sexuality lauded and flaunted at you. I've always expressed my views on tolerance with this saying: your right to swing your arm ends at my face, and I hold that true for furries ( ... )

Reply


scumbone January 19 2004, 08:20:35 UTC
I'm just annoyed with furries because they pop up during my own personal internet pornhunts,which as we know often involve pregnant latino teenagers, and they ruin everything just as surely as the thought of ken or scott naked would. If it wasn't for the internet, I'm DAMN sure there wouldn't BE any furries. There would be people who had random stray sexual thoughts about cartoon animals, and outgrew these urges as soon as they were voiced publicly and then ridiculed. Besides, if fur really WAS sexy, women wouldn't have to shave their legs.

Reply

z0mbarella January 19 2004, 09:42:14 UTC
Ken naked is kinda like a furry

Reply

calypsomyst January 19 2004, 10:00:27 UTC
Yeah. I hate it when they pop up during porn searches; that's why I use Penisbot. And no, fur is not sexy unless it's Nightcrawler.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

calypsomyst January 19 2004, 09:52:55 UTC
Yeah, I know. As I said in the post, "Furries involve degrees of interest in (often sexualized) human/animal crosses, ranging from just artwork or interest, to erotic fanfictions about Bugs Bunny." In fact, the majority of them are probably just into the art. However the Furry community includes the other, disgusting end of the spectrum, and if I am associated with the furry community at all, then by association I am connected to the semen-encrusted wolf costumes. If the non-erotic art people and the LARPers were distinctly separated, I wouldn't mind being associated with the artists...but they aren't separated, they're all lumped in with the sexual deviants under the term "furry." Unfortunate, but until the sexual/social misfires are weeded out, I'm afraid I don't want any connection with the group. Ever.

Now if the artists would just rise up and torment the sex deviants mercilessly until they stopped or were forced to form their own, isolated group, I'd rally with them in a heartbeat.

Reply


scumbone January 19 2004, 11:09:17 UTC
This whole furry situation is strengthening my assertion that sometimes, tolerance is a bad thing. I'm sure some ass will shoot back with "but who are YOU to draw the line??". How original! Who am I to draw the line? I'm someone with a healthy sex life who occasionally looks at tit porn, or at wierdest, pregnant women. Wierd, yes...but not unnatural or repulsive. I do think that a LOT of the blame for the furverts rests with the Japanese and their wide selection of Neko-chan cat-girl porn. God, are the Japanese ever sexually dysfunctional. The worst thing we could do is get into anime porn. I can back this up easily ( ... )

Reply


scumbone January 20 2004, 14:29:47 UTC
I honestly believe that if there were less support for, or solidarity among, people with these outlandish fetishes, at least some people would outgrow them. possibly they could eventually develop a healthy sex life wherein they can have honest, costume-less sex,maybe even with a willing partner.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up