What do you folks make of the rather odd illustrations and diagrams on p.282? I can't make heads or tails of it, but by god it must be important because its depicted on the back cover of my edition. What gives?
The diagram is like a pendulum swinging back and forth, becoming more or less intensely schizophrenic, traversing these different compartments with actual existing medical schizophrenia.. However, I can't tell if they are criticizing or praising the "Universal clinical theory" they are discussing. Typically they despise any sort of bad universality... ironically, rejecting universality is a sort of universal rule for them.
Whew, that's a dissertation right there... but they loathed Hegel, mostly because they viewed all conceptions of "Universal History" as being a purely State-oriented political project. It is the state that creates the impetus for collective action and any kind of general will (or what Marx and subsequent post-marxists like Paolo Virno called "general intellect") and that this creates a vast homogenizing intellectualism... Universal history creates a political theory and collective desire based on a binary choice between "Unity" or "Difference" rather than thinking of politics and desire as "Unifying/Difference
( ... )
Comments 3
(The comment has been removed)
However, I can't tell if they are criticizing or praising the "Universal clinical theory" they are discussing. Typically they despise any sort of bad universality... ironically, rejecting universality is a sort of universal rule for them.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment