Leave a comment

Comments 7

(The comment has been removed)

geekfreak03 November 6 2009, 16:20:15 UTC

... )

Reply

ninja_lettuce November 8 2009, 20:35:32 UTC

... )

Reply

geekfreak03 November 9 2009, 02:34:13 UTC

... )

Reply


endalaust November 6 2009, 18:02:32 UTC
I AGREE THAT NOT USING MICHAEL CERVERIS IS PRETTY DUMB, BUT LANCE REDDICK SAID WE'D LEARN THERE WERE MORE THAN ONE OBSERVER/POSSIBLY CHICK OBSERVERS WHICH MADE ME IMMEDIATELY THINK OF THIS:


... )

Reply

geekfreak03 November 7 2009, 03:40:27 UTC
SHE HAS EYEBROWS THOUGH
AND DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH THERE'S MORE THAN ONE OBSERVER THAT KIIIIIIIID
I DON'T REALLY WANT TO SEE A CHICK OBSERVER LOL

Reply

RE: CHICK OBSERVER endalaust November 9 2009, 19:02:43 UTC
THE CONCEPT WEIRDS ME OUT

Reply


Leave a comment

Up