The case for Eostre, part 2: Bede Revisited

[cavalorn]

Previously on this blog I’ve done my level best to cast doubt on the descriptions of the Anglo-Saxon months given by Bede, pointing out that he was known to have speculated. In one place (Modranecht) he admits he is relating his own suspicions of why an event has the name it does, rather than giving facts of which he had first-hand knowledge. This

Comments

[kakodaimon]

I cannot overstate my hype at seeing this journal updated. Do it again soon!