IC Contact (sirenspull)

Oct 15, 2010 18:57

Sherlock Holmes.

I prefer to text. Keep that in mind if you want a response.

ic contact

Leave a comment

Comments 170

text! girlyboywonder December 10 2010, 02:56:26 UTC
you heard much about Edelweiss?

Reply

[text] caveatwalls December 10 2010, 03:04:30 UTC
Been talking to Kelly, have you?

Reply

girlyboywonder December 10 2010, 03:05:40 UTC
and Rin. and Sasuke. figure they had a whole party over there.

Reply

caveatwalls December 10 2010, 03:10:12 UTC
Latter being the violent one. I remember his transmissions. Why does it interest you?

Reply


[text] axemeaquestion January 20 2011, 06:55:12 UTC
wassap holmes [HEH.]

it's rochelle, you got a minute?

[ooc: gonna be related to this, ohoho.]

Reply

[text] caveatwalls January 20 2011, 06:58:29 UTC
((lulz I figured))

[Someone from the Network. One who wasn't immediately annoying. Hopefully this'd be good.]

Do you have a case inquiry?

Reply

[text] axemeaquestion January 20 2011, 07:02:25 UTC
[ooc: awesome.]

not exactly

do you know about the show News coming up? the one they were talking about in the papers?

Reply

[text] caveatwalls January 20 2011, 07:07:41 UTC
[Not a case wat]

I've read about it, yes.

Reply


[text] todomarishi February 27 2011, 09:22:45 UTC
you're the one who was asking about hearts a week ago?

Reply

[text] caveatwalls February 27 2011, 15:38:52 UTC
Yes.

And you're acquainted with the man doing it. [Don't mind him stalking all the posts ever.]

Reply

[text] todomarishi February 28 2011, 07:38:23 UTC
Xehanort?

[There is only a little eyebrow raising going on over here.]

Reply

[text] caveatwalls February 28 2011, 18:27:39 UTC
Only one with such an eccentric name. Do you have information?

Reply


text message kingofrooks July 21 2011, 11:10:19 UTC
[ Five minutes after Moriarty's post: ]

Old friends?

Reply

[text] caveatwalls July 21 2011, 13:41:16 UTC
[Sherlock isn't entirely shocked. Moriarty seemed to always leave he and John out of his public messages, so it figures there was more to his transmission than whatever they were sent. This time, however, he must have mentioned Sherlock, more than likely by name. Jim from IT's post had nothing to do with him, and John was unlikely to cause any morbid interest. Not to mention Batman was more freakishly punctual about these sorts of things.

But that was sloppy of him. Uncharacteristically sloppy. Code, maybe? Batman wasn't too shabby as far as ciphers went. None of this, of course, merited a straight answer.]

Afraid we haven't known each other that long, Batman.

Reply

[text] kingofrooks July 21 2011, 14:05:18 UTC
[ Oh yes, definitely a code. A code that takes him ten minutes to decipher, which, for some people, would be like taking two weeks or so. Which is why he's intrigued. ]

Really now.

Would you let him bid for Broadwalk so easily?

[ Yes. Monopoly reference. dealwithit.gif ]

Reply

caveatwalls July 21 2011, 20:34:21 UTC
Oh, so you weren't referring to yourself. Personal pronouns would do you wonders.

I assume he wants information about me.

Reply


text girlyboywonder July 22 2011, 08:12:25 UTC
is that him?

Reply

text caveatwalls July 22 2011, 08:20:25 UTC
I see you've mastered your boss' propensity to be vague.

Reply

girlyboywonder July 22 2011, 08:22:53 UTC
just saving time. i thought you'd appreciate it.

Reply

caveatwalls July 22 2011, 08:25:34 UTC
Who do you mean?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up