Obviously I've based this on "me" not on you, but I'd go for the phil and ted's. It doesn't look that "long" compared to other tandems and I don't think, due to the layout of my house that a side by side would work for me, so I'd opt for the phil and teds which would work well on the public transport/places we go, etc.
Really, it depends what your needs are. I spent a long time agonising over getting a double as there is 17 months between my youngest. I didn't drive, so I needed something I could get on buses without too much trouble with, so in the end I went for the Marco Skye L which worked really well for us. It reclined flat at the back so with a bit of padding Abby was able to go in it from birth. Once she was a toddler it was heavy to get up curbs, but all doubles are. Once Andrew was too heavy, we switched to a Maclaren with a buggy board and sold the Marco.
I liked the look of the P&T but it was out of my price range, looked enormous for buses and I worried about the kid underneath, didn't look like it was a very good ride for them (low down and not able to see out the front), but the fact you could use it as a single later seemed nice.
bought the nipper 360, took it out once and felt incredibly irritated that i couldn't take it is most shops because its too wide to fit down aisles. Right pain in the arse. Sold it on ebay immediately, bought p&t and never looked back. There are loads of p&ts i town, they are the most popular buggy i see, and i've never heard anyone say they regretted buying it. well worth the money.
Comments 18
Reply
I liked the look of the P&T but it was out of my price range, looked enormous for buses and I worried about the kid underneath, didn't look like it was a very good ride for them (low down and not able to see out the front), but the fact you could use it as a single later seemed nice.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Amy x
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment