I assumed this was common sense, but now I'm not sure there even is such a thing as "common" sense. After several misunderstandings, I've decided to stop assuming. I want to make a few things clear.
There are people who have "don't disagree with me on my turf" policies in their journals. I'm not one of them. I don't believe I can say anything I
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
I don't like conflicts at all, so I just take it as a given that I might be wrong on this or that. Of course, without a conflict, I don't usually know *which* of my views are more wrong than right and which - the other way around. But that's OK with me - I often like peace and tranquility more than knowledge. In any case, even not seeking conflicts I usually do find them, in various ways, and learn what might be wrong with my views anyway. Heh.
What I wanted to say, good luck! :)
Reply
In my opinion, conflicts are OK as long as everyone stays civil and there are no personal attacks. But it depends on my mood. Sometimes I'll walk away from a disagreement even if it means letting the other person think they won (something that's ridiculously hard for personalities like mine, I admit it).
Thank you. :)
Reply
And I agree with you about politicians. I can't imagine being surrounded by people who just agreed with me. That would be so boring. And miserable. I like a good, healthy disagreement. Hey, I'm going to be a lawyer. It is my personality.
Reply
I can't imagine being surrounded by people who just agreed with me.
I can imagine it. In fact, I don't need to imagine - I remember. I don't know how I didn't go mad from boredom. Oh, wait, I sort of did, but I got out before the madness became permanent. I hope. ;)
Hey, I'm going to be a lawyer. It is my personality.
I could have said that too, and stopped there, but I went further in my reasoning, because I'm a psychology student who is going to be a lawyer. ;) A job where I can be myself... It's almost hard to imagine. Sounds much too good to be real.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I like being exposed to other viewpoints, I just don't care to debate things. I am the peacekeeper who can see both sides and doesn't want to pick one (usually). I also have a crap memory, which doesn't serve me well when trying to defend myself either >.>
And I think people absolutely should be mindful of what they say in their LJ. But people who disagree should be respectful if the person didn't post it in a comm somewhere LOOKING for feedback? If they have any Slytherin self-preservation skillz, though, they'd care about how they're perceived...
Reply
see both sides and doesn't want to pick one
You know, this happens to me quite often. I can see both sides, so how the hell am I supposed to pick one? Making decisions is hard work. I can't imagine being a judge. But arguing is so much fun, I do it sometimes even when I don't really believe what I'm saying. A lawyer isn't just my future job - it's my personality.
But people who disagree should be respectful if the person didn't post it in a comm somewhere LOOKING for feedback
They should be respectful even then... unless the person actually said "I want feedback and insults". Even on fanficrants, outright rudeness is a no-no. I never take the step into rudeness first, but sometimes, when insulted, I'll insult right back. I tend to choose counterattack over defense even when defense would be a better strategy. Too much Slytherin pride. ;)
Reply
Haha, "I want feedback and insults" -- yeahhhhh I didn't mean people should get to be fuckwits or anything if it's in a comm. But if people post controversial things in public places they should expect some dissent, and that maybe the other person won't care about sparing their feelings the way someone on their f-list might?
Ahhh, but then your Slytherin self-preservation should lead you to choose defense!
Reply
Leave a comment