See https://twitter.com/RiskyLiberal/status/264250952201170944

Especially those of us who think of New Jersey as our homeland, wherever we live now.

To the Precinct Station: How theory met practice ...and drove it absolutely crazy | Thomas Frank | The Baffler

https://twitter.com/MittRmoney/status/253990647323824129/photo/1/large

Must-see Obama campaign video portrays Romney as the Gordon Gekko he is

Well, one hopes it’s fixed. :) If anyone can actually read it and would check for more errors, much appreciated: https://bytebucket.org/chemoelectric/pure-geomalg/wiki/nonloco_scribbles.xml

There have been the usual typos and so forth, as well.

I avoided the usual notational confusion by calling the probability of coincidence simply Pcoincidence :)

I don’t have my bell disproof quite right, yet. It’s too bad the physicists tend not to spell out the details, but more or less rely on a presumed prior knowledge of electromagnetic wave theory. It ends up with me having to work out details, and probably with a lot of readers, even physicists, going ‘Huh?’

I did the equivalent of turning in my test without the last minute check that catches the major oversight that can be corrected before time is up if you just hold onto the test for longer.

I have been clarifying the presentation at https://bytebucket.org/chemoelectric/pure-geomalg/wiki/nonloco_scribbles.xml

My disproof of the basis for ‘quantum non-locality’ is complete, though not fully discussed, as it were:
The joint probability result is the one that is supposed to be impossible without spooky superluminal action at a distance, but here it operates in an ordinary manner (if ‘moving tangent vectors’ can be considered ordinary objects). To make the ( Read more... )

While barking up a wrong tree ( Read more... )