So, I was derping around online doing valid and necessary research on the LJRP community for anthropology class (yep, yep, totally) when I ran across
metafandom and of course got sucked in. I was mostly there to look at the topics and find out exactly how one submits articles to be linked, as I'm interested in posting my ethnography (when it is finished) to
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
Although I have to say -- I'm glad there are real feminists around to tell them no for meI can't quite agree with that, or the reinforcing-sense-of-privilege-by-explaining. It would be nice if people would just spontaneously recognize their privilege and work to correct the various -isms (be it racism, sexism, classism, ableism, etc.), but it will never happen, not on an effective scale. It's not fair that minority groups have to explain to people in power why something is wrong and why things need to be changed, and I respect those people who go: "I don't want to be your educator. Sorry ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
My answer is more complicated, though, and sometimes a complicated answer does more harm than good. These men are in a sense saying, "Wait, so if I do this it's sexist but if she does the exact same thing then it's not? Isn't that... sexist?" The most effective answer is not, "Well, it's not the action that is sexist but the beliefs and values behind it..." because most men do not believe that they hold sexist beliefs or values. You are set up to fail because everyone believes either that they are an exception to the rule or that society as a whole isn't as bad as you're painting it.
So, no, the most effective answer that I can think of really is to slap them in the face with, "No, and shut up." When they have been burned enough times to finally get it through their heads that maybe you're not the one with the problem, then they will be ready for the longer explanation.
But by seeing ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment