Personally I'd go with ruins. I'm not much of a jockey and riding isn't really suitable for guys. I'm not much of a sightseer either, but it's more preferable to horse-/self-inflicted groin injuries.
Open bar would be a factor if only one of them had it ;)
well, ruins = 75 dollars for 5 hours, horse = 97 dollars for 3.5 hours... so if you're looking at it that way, if the horse back riding were 5 hours you'd pay $138.57 for that same 5 hour timeslot as you would visiting the mayan ruins. My choice would be neither, because I'm allergic to the sun (not really but it BURNS damnit! my eyes!) and I absolutely hate horses, but in all logical sense and going by the very basic structure of reality I would never go on a cruise in the first place. However, the question is what would you enjoy more? Riding a horse (that may or may not be smelly) through a jungle (that may or may not be infested with mosquitoes) to a lagoon (that may or may not be an absolute cesspool of algae and gawking tourists) or, seeing some ruins (potentially discovering a hidden chamber that connects the mayans to alien descent!!!), will almost certainly have gawking tourists (some of which might be alien tourists come to see how their ancient colony ended up!!), and finally there's the beach which will most likely not be
( ... )
horseback riding would probably destroy your pelvic region for the rest of the trip lest you knew how to ride. Also, horses are stinky and the jungles are humid so it would be uncomfortable for me. That, and you get to save a couple of dollars so you can get more stuff or go do some other fun things :)
Comments 10
If you're more into sightseeing, then do ruins.
Personally I'd go with ruins. I'm not much of a jockey and riding isn't really suitable for guys. I'm not much of a sightseer either, but it's more preferable to horse-/self-inflicted groin injuries.
Open bar would be a factor if only one of them had it ;)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment