(Untitled)

Mar 21, 2009 17:52

I'm thinking of getting a new computer. Mine's about two and a half years old, and although there's nothing specifically wrong with it, there's a lot of room for improvement without breaking the bank too much. There're a lot of choices out there, so I'm just going to publically mull over some of my thoughts in the hope that someone will have a ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

zero44 March 22 2009, 02:04:59 UTC
My thoughts:

Processor: Definitely get an Intel quad-core. I have a Q9450 and highly recommend.

RAM: You probably won't see any difference between 4GB and 8GB. Are you running Vista 64-bit? If not, you can't even utilize above 3.5GB anyway. I run 4GB on XP and have no complaints.

HD: I have used 7200 for years and will probably continue to do so. Unless you're having read/write time issues (very likely not with just gaming and such) 7200RPM should be more than sufficient.

Video: nVidia all the way. I currently have a GTX280 and can play any game out there flawlessly on maximum graphics. There's probably newer ones out since I bought this six months ago or so, but if you want something that'll do anything out there turned up to the max, this card can do it. Also, you can't run SLI and dual monitors at the same time, so if you want to keep the dual monitor setup I don't advise doing that. SLI has, and likely for the forseeable future, is overkill.

Reply

chime March 22 2009, 02:22:16 UTC
Huh, interesting. I saw SLi mentioned a few places, but I don't know much about it. I think I read on one messageboard that for certain very high resolutions, one HAD to use SLi. I think dual-monitor should still be possible with two cards, but I am not really sure that's worthwhile either...

Reply

hyuga March 22 2009, 14:52:53 UTC
Agreed on the RAM. I've never needed more than 4GB on a desktop. I guess with 8 you're really future proofing it. But unless you're gonna be running a bunch of VMs or serving heavy web traffic with lots of caching I can't imagine a need for more thant 4GB.

For the hard drive though, while there may not be a hugely noticable difference between a 7200 RPM drive and a 10,000 RPM drive, there is a difference if you have two 10k drives in a RAID0 configuration, which is what I do. Makes drive access much less of a bottleneck.

Reply


fionnbharro March 22 2009, 13:21:15 UTC
I'd stick with Dell for a laptop -- but go somewhere else for a gaming rig.

Dell is good for a laptop; if a part breaks or needs an upgrade, they pretty much have a lock on the 'easiest to get done' repair and part-availability thing.

But for a gaming rig -- I'd suggest building it yourself, even if you've never done it before. It's very easy, and, frankly, you can get parts (and replacement parts) anywhere. Generally, you get more value for your money (and you can specify where your dollar goes -- a faster graphics card, for instance, rather than the larger hard disk the vendor is trying to move).

Reply

chime March 23 2009, 17:01:42 UTC
I've been trying to look into this somewhat, but I know so little about the core things one needs (chassis, power supply, motherboard)... how can one tell if these things are compatible with one another without having them already? I've been looking through pricewatch.com and anandtech.com, which are helpful for looking at individual components, but I'm not getting a lot on integration.

Is it trivial--is it the case that all modern mobos will fit/screw onto all modern chassis? If not, how can you tell?

As for power supply, I suppose what I hypothetically need to do there is decide everything else first, and then scale the power supply purchase as necessary.

Then there's integration on other stuff too--what video card do I need to run the monitor fairly seamlessly (would probably depend on how high I want the resolution, I guess), as well as having space for a second easier-to-run monitor, and what number of PCIx16 slots I need for that...

Reply

fionnbharro March 23 2009, 17:52:21 UTC
Dirty little industry secret (OK, not so secret, really ( ... )

Reply

fionnbharro March 23 2009, 17:55:11 UTC
I forgot to mention (regarding Power Supplies ("PS"s)) that there is an emerging standard for PS connectors -- it's basically a second 12V pinout, and I came across it for the first time this past September.

If you've got that kind of problem (depends on motherboard and PS), there's a 4-dollar splitter that will solve the problem. Annoying, but do-able.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up