Nick Says...nicknobleNovember 22 2004, 12:06:31 UTC
he wasnt murdered for being a homosexual, everyone knows he just got beat up and then lost his will to live cuz no one likes him. and its not cuz he was gay it was becasue the dudes thought it was funny, they would have picked anyone but they picked him cuz they seen him first, not cuz he was gay, he just happend to be gay.
like if i went out and kicked someones ass for no reson and he happend to die the next day cuz he relized he was a huge loser and he happend to be gay then everyone would be like ah you beat his ass and hes gay and your a homophobe and all that jazz.
i know it was. i found it to be humorous at the time, but it really wasn't. you don't get to know who i am, so i can keep what little dignity which i have.
ok its time for me to be the usual smart-ass devils advocate....
1. it was six years ago, dont you think times have changed somewhat? 2. How was he killed...by who...whats the "rest of the story"
hmm i suppose those are my only questions... besides... i dont know...hmm....what is this silence you are talking about? and do you have any suggestions on stopping it?
Matthew had been lured from a campus bar shortly after midnight on October 7 by two men who told him they were gay. He was driven to a remote area near the Sherman Hills neighbourhood east of Laramie, tied to a split-rail fence, tortured, beaten and pistol-whipped by his attackers, while he begged for his life; he was then left for dead in near freezing temperatures. A cyclist who found him on Snowy Mountain View Road at 6:22 pm, some 18 hours after the attack, at first mistook him for a scarecrow. He was unconscious and suffering from hypothermia. His face was caked with blood, except where it had been partially washed clean by tears
( ... )
yeah... you definitely needed to include that part in the whole thing. i wouldn't have even thought of joking if i had read that. they should have at least not been such asses about it, if it really was they're intent to kill him because he was gay, they should have killed him, not... mutilated him. (that really was intended to sound positive, and it didn't at all.) but yeah, if you are that insecure that you have to beat a defenseless person, in cold blood, and then leave him there alive, you ought to be lit on fire. well, maybe they just ought to be lit on fir for their motives, if they had a good reason to kill him, then it may be different.
Comments 22
Reply
Reply
like if i went out and kicked someones ass for no reson and he happend to die the next day cuz he relized he was a huge loser and he happend to be gay then everyone would be like ah you beat his ass and hes gay and your a homophobe and all that jazz.
Reply
Did you even read the fucking story? Obviously not.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
1. it was six years ago, dont you think times have changed somewhat?
2. How was he killed...by who...whats the "rest of the story"
hmm i suppose those are my only questions... besides... i dont know...hmm....what is this silence you are talking about? and do you have any suggestions on stopping it?
Reply
Reply
Reply
and youre right its not our business, and i DO feel sympathy... and you forgot to tell me HOW i could help silence it !
Reply
Leave a comment