You know, I find it odd that so many Americans have been willing to step up and donate $10 via text, or buy a tshirt, or send money to the Red Cross, or whatever else they do for Haiti, but have proven completely unwilling to pay a little bit more in taxes to help provide healthcare for themselves, their parents, their children, and their neighbors
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
Reply
Seeing as how 40 percent of Americans pay no income tax, I have a hard time feeling like I have to do MORE of my part to help them out with their health insurance.
Not to get all conservative on you, but I don't think raising taxes is the answer.
Reply
But regarding your point: personally, for me, it's less about raising taxes than reallocating my income. We pay so much, as a nation, for health insurance. If I could spend the same amount, or even a bit more, and more or less ensure that I - and everyone I know - would have appropriate coverage for the rest of my life, sign me up.
Reply
But generally, I think the government could do a lot better job of budgeting and if they raised my taxes only a little but I knew that it was being used efficiently to provide health coverage, I would be all about that. It's just hard to picture the government doing anything efficiently... ever.
Reply
(As a side note, when I was working at the Science Museum, they got rid of 100% coverage and people pitched a fit. I was like, really, people?? One hundred percent coverage??? That's just insane.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
When bush had majorities in both houses, you did not in fact see the democrats fillibustering EVERYTHING. In fact I think the only fillibuster threats were for lifetime judicial appointments.
Anyway, the senate bill is really horrible, actually, basically because of the threat of the fillibuster. I'm not sure I would want that passed.
Obama has made countless comments/speeches/etc about the moral imperitive of health care legislation. Doens't get as much attention as things like death panels and "bailouts" though.
Reply
Leave a comment