It's enough to drive a sane person crazy baby let me tell tell you how I feel about you

[chriswalker]

Because Darwin's theory is a theory, it is still being tested as new evidence is discovered. The theory is not a fact. Gaps in the theory exist for which there is no evidence ... Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference book "Of Pandas and People" is available for students to see if

Comments

extremely long, useless, and unprovoked response

[zclifton]

i dont think that it has ever been suggested by anyone credible that "intellgient design" is a scientific theory. it has arisen, i believe, as a rejoinder to the philosophical implications of materialist Darwinism. That is, Darwinism has been used to justify all different kinds of behaviors and is still used to reject certain world views, even if they may be based on metaphysical claims. This is non sensical

[mookyman]

I would be all for a "world religions" class in high school which teaches the origins, central beliefs, and current context of a cross-section of different beliefs, as well as atheism. And "intelligent design" would fit nicely into this class, as would other non-Judeochristian stories. But yeah, this is clearly ridiculous (although I wouldn't mind being taught by Dumbledore, as the above cartoon shows).