A friend directed me to
this news article. Apparently, a woman in Japan was playing a game online in which she had a virtual husband, who was a man she didn't otherwise know living in a city 620 miles away. Her virtual husband suddenly divorced her virtual self with no explanation and she got angry - so angry that she logged onto the computer as
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
Reply
If I were the guy I would not want a trial. I mean, he would have to testify, right? I would prefer to maintain my online anonymity. Her response seems a bit over the top to me.
Reply
Yes, me too.
--Her response seems a bit over the top to me.--
Having seen how online things affect people, though, it doesn't surprise me. It's ultimately no different than someone getting angry with a friend for teaming up against them in a real game, for example. Perhaps her response was childish and petty, but the emotions are not less real because the friendship is online, I don't think.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yes. First, she didn't delete an account of any real consequence, like a bank account - it was a game, which makes it inherently more silly. Second, she didn't hack into his account, which would certainly be illegal - he'd given her the password. It seems to me that he is ultimately responsible for whatever she does with his password. For example, I'm responsible for the content of my blog here. If I gave my password to someone and they posted something that was a violation of the terms of use on this site, I would be responsible for that. I don't see a difference.
Reply
It doesn't really seem like hacking to me if you're using a password that someone gave you. And although it may not matter in a crime, I think the man's being disingenuous. You never, ever give your password to anybody. EVER. What was he thinking? And if he complained quickly enough, surely the game company could have restored his character from a backup server?
Reply
That's what I was thinking. Surely the webmasters (or whatever they're called) who run the game could have reversed what she'd done, so there would be no permanent "harm".
Reply
I mean, I can see charging her for electronic hacking... but is it really hacking if she was given the password? And five years seems so excessive!
Reply
*lol*
Reply
Leave a comment