So it's finally summer. I'm not sure what to think. I shook the dust off my feet at the outskirts of Tampa and now I'm living with my mom in Lakeland for a couple months. I'll be working at the USF bookstore for the majority of the break, and then I'm taking a math class the last month before Fall semester begins.
I recently received a letter from
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
I'm a fairly recent convert to Orthodoxy, so I can't guarantee that what I write is the Church's position, but this is the best I understand right now:
With regards to the Old Testament, while we certainly do believe that it is Divinely inspired, and written by honest people, what we're most interested in are the messianic prophecies therein. In the first few centuries of the Church, it was pored over in exhaustive detail for every phrase that sounds like a phrase from the Gospels. We get these really detailed hymns, then, about OT typology, for example ( ... )
Reply
Reply
So far as I can tell, there's nothing inherently wrong with being rational or scientific; problems only arise from limiting yourself to what's purely rational. But if you've accepted that Gallilean rabbis can rise from the dead (certain of them, anyway), you clearly haven't gone off the deep end in the rationalist direction.
The Church needs rationalist-leaning people and mystical-leaning people both; the mix is good for everyone. One of the nice things about the fullness of Orthodoxy -- how there's so much of everything in there -- is that everyone can find something they connect with, though it's different for everyone.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment