Elliott Spitzer: Latest victim of the Mann Act

Mar 11, 2008 10:44

Of course, it's all very embarrassing and sad that Elliott Spitzer's name was leaked to the press, along with an affidavit alleging his involvement in prostitution. Now, will someone please explain why this case was prosecuted by the Public Integrity Section under the White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910? Also known as The Mann Act, this law has been ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 18

ikkarus01 March 11 2008, 14:52:56 UTC
I read somewhere that it has to do with the fact that he paid to have the prostitute cross state lines. I don't know the details, though, and I'm way too lazy to look.

Reply

clayfoot March 11 2008, 15:08:10 UTC
That is, indeed, how the Mann Act can be applied to such a case. The Supreme Court ruled on the Act in 1913 that, while Congress could not regulate prostitution, per se, it could regulate interstate travel for the purposes of prostitution or other "immoral purposes." Not the best law on record, but very useful if you want to bring down a public figure.

Reply

clayfoot March 11 2008, 15:41:18 UTC
Just to clarify a bit, it doesn't really matter that Spitzer transferred a prostitute across state lines. Under the Mann Act, Spitzer (or anyone else) can be prosecuted under the Mann Act for transferring someone across state lines for any kind of extramarital sex, including consensual sex between two single people.

Reply

ikkarus01 March 11 2008, 15:44:37 UTC
Really? Well that's a pretty bizarre interpretation. That sounds like it's open to a whole array of potential misuses.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

clayfoot March 11 2008, 15:15:37 UTC
Try the Google cache or the Internet way-back machine, though those are bound to be swamped, too.

Reply

k_sui March 11 2008, 16:19:53 UTC
Slate had the rundown yesterday in their "Hot Document" column.

Reply

clayfoot March 11 2008, 16:28:06 UTC
Well, you'd have to judge by looking from the nose, down.

Reply


ariock March 11 2008, 15:27:23 UTC
This WHOLE THING started ringing alarm bells in my head when I heard they'd found the information during federal wiretapping.

I wonder if they could show whether or not any of this was found under putative anti-terrorism laws.

Reply

clayfoot March 11 2008, 15:37:44 UTC
A good question. According to ABC news, the investigation started when Spitzer's bank reported to the IRS about suspicious money transfers from his account. We're talking in the thousands of dollars, here. Now, why do you suppose the bank contacted the IRS, instead of Spitzer? And how did that report lead to an affidavit filing under the Mann Act?The suspicious financial activity was initially reported by a bank to the IRS which, under direction from the Justice Department, brought in the FBI's Public Corruption Squad.

"We had no interest at all in the prostitution ring until the thing with Spitzer led us to learn about it," said one Justice Department official.

Reply


vectorb March 11 2008, 17:01:19 UTC
Why does Mann always gata keep you down?

Reply

clayfoot March 11 2008, 17:11:01 UTC
To extirpate extramarital interstate intercourse, apparently.

Reply

vectorb March 11 2008, 17:12:12 UTC
Damn the Mann! (act)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up