User Test!

[cmouse]

Hello all - we've got a new user test. It would be awesome if some of you took a moment to do it. I honestly need results as soon as possible (measured in hours, not days).

User test

Thanks!

Comments

[archonsengine]

A suggestion: on the "teaching Open Mind about a concept" page, you might want to add a button to return to the main site when you don't want to enter more information.

Oh, and Open Mind should know about poker now.

[cmouse]

Ack! You're supposed to enter 20 things and then it will bounce you back to the main site.

[archonsengine]

Oh, whoops. It does say that on the page where you add your concept, but I apparently overlooked it and got tired of adding things about poker at around 12. My bad. =o]

[iluvsheep]

I tried to teach it about Perl. I think I should have used "Doesn't make sense" more often. Ah well.

[anonymous]

I believe its based on GWAP's verbosity. with only difference being that instead of a person on other side you have an algorithm

[anonymous]

I believe its based on GWAP's verbosity. with only difference being that instead of a person on other side you have an algorithm

[cheesyhill]

It's a little odd that in the survey at the end, all of the answers are positive things except for "This was *not* an efficient way to enter data" (or whatever). It might be good to bold the not or even flip the question and remove it altogether.

And now OpenMind knows more about coffee. Mmm

[gaussjordan]

I concur about the negative questions.

[cheesyhill]

Err, that should be "Flip the question and remove the not altogether"

[cheesyhill]

I guess the question is negative because it allows to find persons who are
trying to vandalize the results.
If someone just marks all options as strongly disagree one can use last question to find whether the person is vandal or not.

[anonymous]

Congrats its Obama for the president.