Out of interest ...

Jul 25, 2008 19:02

Following on from a mutually surprising discussion last weekend:

Poll

Justification in the comments welcomed.

neal stephenson, books, polls

Leave a comment

Comments 28

secritcrush July 25 2008, 18:09:21 UTC
Everything published after snow crash is the answer to part two.

Reply

abrinsky July 25 2008, 18:10:14 UTC
Which is close to my answer although I did rather like Diamond Age.

Reply

lamentables July 25 2008, 18:12:29 UTC
Yes, I demand ticky boxes for part 2.

Reply

coalescent July 25 2008, 18:28:26 UTC
It can't all be equally bad. :p

Reply


abrinsky July 25 2008, 18:09:23 UTC
Not fair... wont let me vote for Cryptonomicon and everything that comes after it (and I'll include Anathem even though it sounds great due to its size).

Reply

coalescent July 25 2008, 18:28:04 UTC
I've just finished Anathem, and think it's something of a return to form. (Admittedly I haven't read The Confusion and The System of the World yet, but I'm assuming they'll be much the same as Quicksilver.). That said, I count Cryptonomicon as on form, so ...

Reply

abrinsky July 25 2008, 18:30:39 UTC
I do so want to like it but.... 935 pages?

(and I have to confess I never got beyond half way with Cryptonomicon)

Reply

coalescent July 25 2008, 18:36:49 UTC
935 pages divided into 13 digestible chunks! That's not even a hundred pages a chunk. It's also one, first-person narrative, and I found it to be pretty well paced. The middle third lags a bit, but the first 300 pages and the last 200 are great.

That said ...

Reply


white_hart July 25 2008, 18:42:32 UTC
Loved Snow Crash, couldn't finish Cryptonomicon, haven't read any Stephenson since. And it's got to be pretty bad to put me off him completely.

Reply

coalescent July 25 2008, 18:52:42 UTC
I wonder whether Stephenson fans divide into early and late? For me, Cryptonomicon is a substantial step up from everything that came before.

Reply

white_hart July 25 2008, 19:00:05 UTC
I am half-tempted to give it another go sometime, as I seem to be reading so much faster these days; I think half the problem was that I got completely bogged down and spent about three months reading the first 200-odd pages, and then I simply couldn't face spending the next six months slogging through the rest.

Reply

ex_susumu64 July 25 2008, 21:18:45 UTC
It is, but the Diamond Age is so much cooler.

Reply


despotliz July 25 2008, 18:50:23 UTC
Cryptonomicon-hating wrongheads are everywhere!

(I haven't read Cobweb or The Big U, but I thought Interface was not so great.)

Reply

sinboy July 25 2008, 20:09:15 UTC
Loved cobweb. Pure mystery / spy thriller.

Reply

andrewducker July 25 2008, 22:03:25 UTC
I bounced off both The Big U and Zodiac.

Snow Crash was ok, Diamond Age was great - and then it kept getting better!

Reply

abigail_n July 25 2008, 22:15:54 UTC
The Big U gets points for a) featuring a lesbian relationship as normal, loving, and in some ways the most positive relationship in the book, b) containing a scene of attempted sexual assault in which the potential victim is rescued by another woman, and c) not going over the top with either of these. Given that in later books Stephenson goes for the women-as-hot-superheroes approach, this was a refreshing find. Other than that, though, it's clearly a journeyman novel, and Stephenson hadn't tapped into his grade A material yet while writing it.

Reply


truecatachresis July 25 2008, 19:08:47 UTC
I can't easily place a "worst" Stephenson, because I've not actually read one I haven't enjoyed immensely.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up