Derren Brown and magical narrative

Oct 28, 2012 09:40

My daughter is a big fan of Derren Brown and she was telling me about his new show Apocalypse. We were saying how his explanations of 'how he does it' are always fake, and the real trick is something else going on while your attention is caught up in his elaborate psychological explanation. And also how he makes use of the narratives which already ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

sugoll October 28 2012, 16:34:27 UTC
In general, I'm a big fan of Brown's work, but I much prefer his earlier series or his more standard "variety" live shows to the "Events" of recent years. In particular, I was offended and disturbed by shows like the "remote control" story, or the "assassin", etc. I think they cross a line.

I've read Tricks of the Mind, and it's good stuff.

Reply

communicator October 28 2012, 16:41:25 UTC
I haven't really seen any of them, so I am going on what my daughter said. But in my opinion the people involved are not really 'fooled' or hypnotised into believing what they are experiencing is real.

Instead they are immersed, as you would be in a gripping book, and willingly suspending their disbelief. They have consented to go along with it as if it is real. That can be quite emotionally intense - when I am engrossed in a film or book I can be frightened or sad or whatever, but I think it is always with some element of control and distance.

That's partly what I mean about showmanship and using the narrative of being part of a Derren Brown show.

So, I don't think it is as damaging or extreme as it might seem. However there might be other elements which are offensive, I'm only talking about the pretense that someone is totally 'brainwashed' into thinking the show is real.

Reply


sugoll October 28 2012, 16:37:52 UTC
With respect to the governmental narrative, I've complained about that in the past. Specific examples include things like the sword "bans", that have been implemented in different ways in England and Scotland. In both cases, existing legislation was entirely sufficient to cover the high-profile cases, and there were no useful records kept by any police force to do an analysis on how laws could be improved. So instead, an arbitrary, unnecessary law was brought in in order to be seen to do something, rather than to actually do something.

I imagine that happens a lot.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up