(9) Puzzles III

May 17, 2011 20:36

[Phone, standard filter:]

Residents of Mayfield...

What is your definition of art, and do you believe it is important?

black mage, aigis, kyon, merem solomon, !: puzzles, bernkastel, keigo katsuragi, patchouli knowledge, garviel loken, glados, yuki nagato

Leave a comment

Comments 219

lunawolves10th May 18 2011, 00:39:51 UTC
Art is absolutely important, at least, the creative exercise involved with making it is. As for what is art? Best to ask Fulgrim or a member of the Emperor's children. But... since I am here I shall answer to the best of my capacity.

Art is an expression of the artist's conscious or subconscious thoughts through the medium of their chosen art form.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:44:22 UTC
I agree that it is perhaps most important as an exercise of the creative functions of humanity. That is, after all, one of humanity's defining characteristics.

As for your definition, however, I would ask, what is opposed to 'conscious or subconscious'? That is, for that term to have meaning, it would require juxtaposition to something; it cannot simply mean everything, unless you wish to admit every action under this heading. And if you wish to do that, the term loses meaning.

Reply

lunawolves10th May 18 2011, 00:59:49 UTC
I have seen wonderfully crafted bio-weapons made by the Megarachnids of the planet Murder. There was no guiding intelligence behind them. It was simply instinct that the kill blade-arms they had were also beautiful to behold.

They were beautiful, you could say, but not art. Art is a blade forged by a man, not the natural byproduct of evolution.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 01:12:18 UTC
But a man-made replica of those weapons would be considered art, then? Even if though by necessity this would involve only technical skill rather than creativity?

Reply


cruelmiracle May 18 2011, 00:42:52 UTC
Individual purpose expressed in an elegant manner through various mediums.

[Also, hi Sasaki. Remember her?]

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:47:51 UTC
...

[A pause, then, evenly:]

Does 'various' mean that any number of media are admissible? Are projects created by multiple people not art, because they don't express an individual's purpose? And what manner of elegance is required? Many pieces of art feature grotesque deaths, for example, and bloodshed--they are called 'raw', which is opposed to the word 'elegant.'

[And despite everything, this cursed instinctive reaction of a shiver passes through her, just barely noticeable in her boice.]

Reply

cruelmiracle May 18 2011, 00:51:41 UTC
Any medium is acceptable, and anything which is not boring could be considered some level of art, although for high art it should really be elegant. Death and bloodshed can be such as well, done properly. As for a piece in which multiple people participate, there is certainly a unifying element, or it becomes a mess.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:56:10 UTC
Philip Glass is a writer of music which is repetitive and often static. In other words, boring. John Cage wrote many pieces whose purpose was stretching the definition of art, and which are extremely 'boring', in a day-to-day definition of the word, at least.

What are some examples of things you consider art?

Reply


sosnarrator May 18 2011, 00:46:01 UTC
Art, huh?

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:48:15 UTC
Yes, Kyon, have you heard of it?

[Still a little bit cool...]

Reply

sosnarrator May 18 2011, 00:51:13 UTC
Of course. I'm not sure it's something that can be so easily defined though, as one's perception of art can often be somewhat subjective.

(Like a lot of those "modern art" pieces at the gallery... In some cases, my sister could probably do better with a set of crayons.)

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:53:28 UTC
Certainly; that's why I'm asking for individuals' definitions. Of course, I plan to argue it with them as well. I don't believe the question is going to be resolved by this discussion.

Reply


getsciencedone May 18 2011, 00:49:19 UTC
[Why do you do this daughter? Database search.]

art

-noun
1.The quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

2.The class of objects subject to aesthetic criteria; works of art collectively, as paintings, sculptures, or drawings: a museum of art; an art collection.

3.A field, genre, or category of art: Painting is an art.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 00:52:15 UTC
[...Why do you do this, mom? Sheesh.]

...Quite.

Well, I suppose that answers one question about artificial intelligence, at least.

Thank you. Do you think of anything as art, Glados?

Reply

getsciencedone May 18 2011, 00:55:07 UTC
[Because she's an AI]

If we go by that definition. I would say I find an art in Science.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 01:07:08 UTC
Hmm. Yes, well, I can't say that comes as much of a surprise, Glados. Anything else?

[Cake? ...Not anymore, huh? Oh well.]

Reply


wise_king May 18 2011, 01:01:47 UTC
The Crimson Moon once said my works were exquisite pieces of art.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 01:07:31 UTC
Who is the Crimson Moon, and what are your works?

Reply

wise_king May 18 2011, 01:14:35 UTC
My creator. And my works are the human imagination.

Reply

cramschoolgod May 18 2011, 01:16:33 UTC
Ahh, yes, of course. What is this Crimson Moon like? Is it a sentient being of a similar sort to humanity, or on a higher level?

In any case, that cannot be much of a surprise, as the human imagination is necessarily the source of human art.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up