A Poll

[craziasian]

This morning, mr. anon and I were discussing the possibility of hiring an amateur photographer for the wedding.

mr. anon: well, I'd want to be sure they'd have insurance.
me: why? in case their equipment got damaged?
mr. anon: no, to sue them if our pictures came out bad.

The poll I would like to take today is:
WHO THINKS THAT SUING A

Comments

Re: psycho but necessary

[craziasian]

see, I would file describing the guns you are going to kill your photographer as PSYCHO. but that is just me.

[anonymous]

I agree that insurance is necessary. However, how can you put a monetary value on your wedding pictures? I would mean insurance in the back-up sense. How do they double-check that the pictures will be successful? I know - why don't you hire a courtroom sketch artist?! That would be awesome.

Donny

[craziasian]

if you can have your intern find a sketch artist to do that for us for free, i am totally willing to have one.

but you didn't answer the poll: isn't suing a photographer a little psycho? stop being an actuary and thinking about insurance!

[anonymous]

I vote for the boardwalk caricature artist.

And threatening to sue is not psycho. Actually going through with it, though, is.

Donny