} 029 - [VIDEO, public] - in which Amanda acts like there are huge double standards

[creatingalegacy]

[Amanda is, as usual, sitting in her room, upon the bed. The difference is that, aside from her bed and clothing, her room is completely bare. Guess who lost all her stuff again? Amanda doesn't actually care about this issue at all, but that won't stop her from purposefully trying to sow anger and unrest!]

If I'd done to someone else what Edward

Comments

[ifightfor]

Suggest double standard exists due to erratic behavior of class:Inmate compared to class:Warden.

[Rinzler senses a flaw in your argument.]

[creatingalegacy]

If an inmate had done this they would have been hauled to Zero immediately. However, Sexby was allowed to walk around a free man until after the Marquis received medical treatment--even though his inmate announced that Sexby was the culprit! Because he was a warden, they overlooked the need to penalize him for beating an old man.

What part of that sounds reasonable to you?

[She really cares very little about the issue at hand. She just wants to create discord.]

[ifightfor]

"Reasonable" a User concept.

Suggest immediate response to Inmate behavior founded in likelihood that aggressive Inmate will continue pattern of aggression against other individuals and/or property; aggressive Warden acting out personal grudge and therefore harmless to uninvolved individuals.

Level of response proximate to level of threat as matter of efficiency.

[creatingalegacy]

Since the people involved are "users," "user" concepts account for all of it. You should refrain from judging things you're incapable of comprehending.

[ifightfor]

Emotional content disregarded as matter of efficiency, not lack of understanding.

User concept of "fairness" largely found to be detrimental to system stability due to immaturity as governing process.

[creatingalegacy]

The Barge isn't a "system" in the way a computer is. We're people, not circuits, and if you eliminate emotion you eliminate your ability to debate this topic with those of us affected by it.

[ifightfor]

Query: Why?

[creatingalegacy]

Those involved in this debacle were all human. "Users." If you're going to disregard what makes us human, or say it doesn't matter, you can't comment on the issue and its effects as if you truly understand them...because you're looking at this from a perspective of efficiency, not morality.

[ifightfor]

Advanced morality designed to facilitate cohesion of User society, function of system inclusive.

Efficiency and morality compatible.

[creatingalegacy]

I've seen your kind of morality in action. It never works as well as its proponents like to claim.

[ifightfor]

Specify.

JA307020 not designed to prefer a system of morality.

[creatingalegacy]

You want me to describe the human condition for you?

[ifightfor]

No.

[Delayed text.]

Only why one has to be miserable to correct it.

[creatingalegacy]

You've just proven that you could never understand or accept what you want to know.

[ifightfor]

Query: Why?

[creatingalegacy]

Fuck's sake...I give up. Go over what you just said again and figure it out for yourself.