Super Tuesday

Feb 04, 2008 20:13

I hear a lot of you talking about Obama and how excited you are about his presence, his leadership, his vision ( Read more... )

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 20

ladybarnard February 5 2008, 01:51:16 UTC
It's what he doesn't have that interests me. Baggage ( ... )

Reply

creidylad February 5 2008, 02:40:49 UTC
An understandable strategic decision; not one possible in NY where you can only vote as you're registered. As I was just pointing out to Rani23 down there, I have found a lot of Krugman's articles persuasive that there is a tangible difference in their policy agendas. For one thing, his has no teeth vs. the republican plans. He can't run on it in the big race.

Reply

ladybarnard February 5 2008, 03:43:32 UTC
Not yet. But there is plenty of room for refinement once the nomination is secured.

Reply


lollardfish February 5 2008, 01:53:21 UTC
It's a fair question. First, I have to say that I am not now and never have been a Clinton democrat. I see no signs that H. Clinton will run things any differently ( ... )

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

lollardfish February 5 2008, 13:54:48 UTC
To my mind, Clinton Democrats were pro-corporate/business at the expense of unions, unemployed, underemployed, and other vulnerable folks in our society. When I look back at the legacy of the Clinton years, I don't see a lot to be proud about.

Reply


zthulu February 5 2008, 01:56:28 UTC
I've avoided giving my opinions this year, but since you asked.. ;)

The biggest thing I like about Obama's platform is his education plan. Not only is it an impressive, complete, comprehensive reform package, but he's announced how he's going to pay for itAnd, yes, I do find his his feel-good speeches about uniting America very inspiring, even if they are light on substance. He is asking the country to put partisan politics behind us to make the world a better place. Naive? Perhaps. But it appeals to the idealist in me ( ... )

Reply

joe_bacchus February 6 2008, 06:24:23 UTC
can you recommend one or two of the above mentioned books on Clinton economics and the Asian economies? Thanks.

Reply


catya February 5 2008, 01:56:52 UTC
I don't see a big enough position difference between them to change my vote based on position. (Even on healthcare - either will be a vast improvement, after all)

It's lots of intangible stuff that swings me to Obama - how i think his leadership will change the place of the US in the world, how he is inspiring younger people to care about politics, that sort of thing.

I will totally not be sad if she wins, and i would vote for her in the General Election with no qualms at all.

Reply


lollardfish February 5 2008, 02:01:35 UTC
"Still, I like Clinton's ferocious and unapologetic intelligence a great deal, and that she doesn't pander. "

I love her intelligence. I'm just not convinced that detail-oriented is actually necessary. A president deals with hundreds of things a day, sets broad agendas, and follows up on how things are going.

Moreover, I very much think she does pander as much as any of them. Why do you think she doesn't?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up