Comments | cryptozoology: New Montauk Monster Sighting

evershadowangel in cryptozoology

New Montauk Monster Sighting

May 14, 2009 18:51

( Read more... )

Comments 11

(The comment has been removed)

pepperbeast May 14 2009, 23:45:05 UTC

The other possible ID for the original was a raccoon-- not skinned, but just minus fur from being in the water for a while. *This* one looks like it could be a raccoon, too.

___thesuburbs May 15 2009, 00:01:14 UTC

yeah, i'd never heard the boxer identification, but i sorta lost track of it after a few weeks. as far as i knew it was a raccoon, which i'm guessing this to be as well.

shegeek May 15 2009, 00:07:20 UTC

I heard the raccoon thing too. Wasn't it confirmed?

pepperbeast May 15 2009, 00:31:12 UTC

No, of course not... people are soooo fascinated by the odd things they find-- but never a plastic bag's worth of fascination.

tengutengu May 15 2009, 18:55:24 UTC

Pretty much, yeah.

tengutengu May 15 2009, 19:00:00 UTC

Oh, and same for this new one.

monkey_kong May 15 2009, 00:09:08 UTC

I know pretty much nothing about animal skulls, but that looks dog-ish to me.

finback May 15 2009, 02:15:51 UTC

Man, that list of 40 creatures. A lot of them have photos of totally unrelated cryptids, several of which were shown to be fakes.

And, why is the snipe even in there? It's a bird!

willowwpryce May 15 2009, 03:20:20 UTC

Where did you find the picture of the big bird at the end there?