Dave Wiegand surpasses Joe Edley...

Mar 21, 2010 16:01

as the LUCKIEST player EVER ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

badqoph March 21 2010, 20:20:54 UTC
Wiegand vs Gibson, I assume you're talking about V(OWE)D? What would you have played there and why?

Reply

badqoph March 21 2010, 20:50:06 UTC
i don't know what i woulda played, but i KNOW i wouldna VOWED.

analyzin da position, i can see how he made da mistake cuz it don't make sense 2 take 7 pts when u can score 18. but dat should b a hint dat it technically aint da right play. i tend 2 like da best STRATEGIC play n dat look like PARVO 2 me.

u kill da O n da LIKES--up 25 huuggin a blank vs dat pool leavin opp only lucky column N dat u STILL can overcome (all 60 ppoint shitters woud be answerable vs ugly postbingo rack).

Reply


wallydraigle March 22 2010, 20:58:16 UTC
To be fair to Wiegand, he runs bad too. I'm just that the way he drew in Phoenix was absolutely sick, and he hasn't run well in BATs. If you look at the 2000 Nationals final game, Wiegand really deserved to win that game also. Just because you run well doesn't mean you don't also sometimes run bad.

If you saw the last day of the last two tournaments I played in, you'd be a lot more appalled at what I'm drawing than what Wiegand is drawing. That being said, I've been unlucky in some spots too: just not lately. Everyone runs good sometimes and runs bad sometimes.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up