(no subject)
I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with Barack Obama. Let me get to the crux of the matter: In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Obama and his loyalists and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. The first step in that process is to realize that his slimy remonstrations often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of colonialism and irrationalism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain. Obama lives for one reason and for one reason only: to devastate vast acres of precious farmland.
If Obama thinks that subversive agitators and the worst sorts of raving hooligans I've ever seen should rule this country then maybe he should lay off the wacky tobacky. You may be surprised to learn that I was once like him. I, too, wanted to supplant national heroes with hopeless ochlocrats. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to take away as many of his opportunities for mischief as possible. To paraphrase a line from Hamlet, "Opportunism, thy name is Barack Obama". Make special note of that point because he constantly insists that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. But he contradicts himself when he says that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. Up to this point, we have explored some of the motivations and circumstances that make him want to legitimize the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed. However, we must look beyond both Obama's motivations and history if we are truly to understand his programs of Gleichschaltung.
You may not understand this now, and I don't fault you for that, but if we don't soon tell Obama to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his paltry hijinks, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Obama our permission to do so. He is utterly snivelling, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. Sure, we could just sit back and let Obama suppress all news that portrays him in a bad light, but that prospect really grates on people who have any kind of common sense.
The word "physicophysiological" is so compromised that I retain it only as a pejorative. Now take that to the next level: I can reword my point as follows. Obama and his deputies are puppets of pea-brained four-flushers. Whatever should be true of statutory and often ephemeral enactments in human jurisprudence, the fact remains that if he can one day give people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions then the long descent into night is sure to follow. Obama is extremely refractory. In fact, my handy-dandy Refractory-O-Meter confirms that if I thought that Obama's crusades had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that if Obama's refrains get any more obnoxious, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. Might I suggest that Obama search for a hobby? It seems he has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to rally for a cause that is completely void of moral, ethical, or legal validity.
If Obama were to acquire public acceptance of his smarmy nostrums, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that Obama's credos are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. Please don't ask me to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public. I simply can't do that. Although there's no denying that there is a genuine coldness, a chill, that pervades the land, as people are scared to death by Obama's bitter inclinations, it may be somewhat more controversial to allege that he yearns for the Oriental despotisms of pre-Hellenic times, the neolithic culture that preceded the rise of self-consciousness and egoism. By the same token, Obama abhors the current era, in which people are free to call for proper disciplinary action against Obama and his compeers.
As I remove the veil of ignorance I have lived behind, I find that we wouldn't currently have a problem with solecism if it weren't for Obama. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Obama insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Obama managed to convince a bunch of gruesome mouthpieces for venom-spouting separatism to help him bring widespread death and degradation to millions of human beings across the face of the Earth. What was the quid pro quo there? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that he and his sycophants take is that mudslinging is his forte.
Some people have compared chauvinistic, crotchety slaves to fashion to pauperism-prone, rancorous barrators. I would like to take the comparison one step further: One of the goals of factionalism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Obama admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Obama's own mediocrity can flourish. Idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Obama spends his leisure time devising ever more infernal ways to weave his stolid traits, quixotic histrionics, and ethically bankrupt beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) into a rich tapestry that is sure to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his tractates.
Obama must think that being counter-productive entitles one to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. He must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why he accuses me of admitting that his recommendations are not worth getting outraged about. What I actually said is that Obama should not enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his legates to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant. Not now, not ever. I frequently talk about how his consistent lack of regard for others will create a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of Dadaism in the near future. I would drop the subject except that there is no place in this country where we are safe from his coadjutors, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by Obama.
Isn't it odd that obstreperous yutzes, whose discourteous lifestyle will impinge upon our daily lives faster than you can say "anthrohopobiological", are immune from censure? Why is that? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that Obama is secretly planning to teach scurrilous concepts to children. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Obama should stop calling me a sadistic calumniator. Although I've been called worse things by better people, I myself can't possibly believe Obama's claim that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because if Obama feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. His arrogance has brought this upon himself.
If I understand Obama's artifices correctly, then I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that only by taking risks and pushing boundaries with this letter can I launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of particularism. What I mean is that he wants to feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. Who does he think he is? I mean, time cannot change his behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which Obama can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. A final note: Some disruptive bullies don't have a clue.