My reply to Mick

Nov 16, 2008 18:44

I hate doin' the ol' 'running to my own personal posting space' in defense of my position, but I've never liked my statements being taken out of context or warped, so ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

john_flint November 17 2008, 02:00:41 UTC
I'm really quite baffled at his response to me. Apparently I'm a homophobe even though half the people I hang out with in real life are gay, and I go to the gay club more often than any other bar in town.

And, y'know, Dino is a coward who calls himself a maverick. Because Dino is in actuality John McCain's evil, cowardly mirror duplicate.

Reply

daningram November 17 2008, 02:06:35 UTC
What'd ya say to him? I'm guessing that he's deleted all replies.

Reply

john_flint November 17 2008, 12:42:04 UTC
I posted in his latest journal entry "this is just a test to see if I'm still banned here." His reply:

"You make a good point. You should be banned for alluding I am a homosexual. Which not only has a pejorative effect on those who are truly homosexual, but it sets a precedent for your homophobic behavior. Which you, Ingram, and Dino are notoriously guilty for.

So consider yourself re-banned Joel."

WTF?

Reply

dinopollard November 17 2008, 05:06:37 UTC
I'm kind of confused myself. He says I claim I'm a maverick, I can't recall one time when I have ever called myself a maverick. He also claims I don't have the balls to speak my mind when if there's one criticism I have, it's that I speak my mind too much.

This is another aspect of his warped, bizarro-world. I seriously want this guy to volunteer himself for neurological research. His mind works in such a fucked-up way, it'd be really interesting to see how he comes to his conclusions.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up