i got: below average, genius, genius, above average respectively, w/ a numerical score of 125 which is lower than i know my IQ has tested. in 16 Q's, that's an average of 4 per metric, and they were not easy (some of them) so i'm thinking that 1-2 was average in each metric... wondering if they had q's w/ partially right (ie - if the thinking went this way they answer A, but if they thought as i meant them to, the answer is B) q's that gave 1/2's? *boggling*
So am I, which is why I wanted to be able to validate the results. I am not making the assumption that they actually have the correct answers to their questions! :-)
I've never known what my I.Q. actually is (or was :-) and don't really think I have much faith in a single number without a confidence interval to represent such a slippery intangible as intelligence.
Comments 3
bizarre!
*bb off to take it herself*
Reply
wondering if they had q's w/ partially right (ie - if the thinking went this way they answer A, but if they thought as i meant them to, the answer is B) q's that gave 1/2's?
*boggling*
Reply
I've never known what my I.Q. actually is (or was :-) and don't really think I have much faith in a single number without a confidence interval to represent such a slippery intangible as intelligence.
Reply
Leave a comment