One of the most common charges levelled against the Dresden files series is that is mysogonistic. While it is possible to understand where these critics come from, this interpretation isn't entirely accurate.
Point 1: Sexism only gets you into trouble
Harry's sexism is not something that makes his life easier; in fact it often makes it worse. In the
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
This is a good analysis of the series, and I find the discussion of Harry's evolution as a character pretty compelling. Coincidentally, I've encountered a couple other criticisms of Jim Butcher's writing and I wonder if you'd care to address them?
First, there's the charge that all of the women in The Dresden Files are sexualized (i.e. described in highly sexual terms). I would add that many of them go along with this: just from what I've read so far you have Susan; the victim in book 1; Bianca; and the werewolf from book 2, Tera West. The sexualized description part makes sense coming from Harry (though it's still kind of sketchy), but according to some people who've read Codex Alera say ( ... )
Reply
2.) Murphy's a female cop in a job dominated mostly by men which means she's somewhat of an outcast.
3.) Harry hasn't been laid in 9 years come storm front. Also, most of the magical creatures are those that manipulate the mortal world (white court vampires where the males do the same thing
Reply
Reply
One of the things Winterfox's reviews said that bugged me is that Harry's attitude was supported
Well, I think she was referring specifically to Storm Front (the only one she's read). If his attitude is largely supported in that book, then I think criticizing it specifically is valid, even if the series as a whole ultimately condemns that attitude.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment