Yup. Well, most of a snake, with double exposure to give it a weird blurred quality. And the aristic reasoning behind using that technique is... er... too complicated to explain ;)
Yes, they got the labelling wrong on the website: it's actually the 19 and over category shown - don't worry, I didn't deviously enter the kids' category! :)
*Blushes* Well, it was only a little photography competition. Most of my photographs are of snails, which aren't hugely photogenic (I have around 250 snail photographs from Indonesia on my computer at the moment, and 3 photographs of humans - this probably speaks unpleasant volumes about my character!). Thanks for the nice comment, though. :)
I have around 250 snail photographs from Indonesia on my computer at the moment, and 3 photographs of humans - this probably speaks unpleasant volumes about my character!
If there were 250 humans who carried their houses on their backs, I'm sure you'd have photos of *them*. Not your fault that snails are more interesting.
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
:)
Reply
*bounces for science communication and points to the Young Wildlife Photographer competition*
Reply
Reply
If there were 250 humans who carried their houses on their backs, I'm sure you'd have photos of *them*. Not your fault that snails are more interesting.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment