Regionals in The UK and work.

Jun 22, 2005 12:34

Well, its Wednesday the 22nd and sat is the regionals for the UK near me. It isnt like back in the states where they are all held the same day. These people actually have there regionals on weekends and like spread out over like a whole month. I missed the last one that was held in Petersburogh, ( I dont think that is how it spelled but oh well). ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

anonymous June 22 2005, 15:22:09 UTC
Yeah, the british spell a lot differently than we do. Btw, I think The Patriot overglorifies the Americans. I mean, we were getting uppity, we had it coming, and the British definiatly wern't the pushovers. We didn't actually win a battle until we attacked sleeping, hung over germans, and all we did was steal thier shit. I just think that movie is kind of skewed in the Americans favor, sort of like every WW2 movie you've ever seen.
-Nick

Reply

The news and what-not! decree25 June 22 2005, 15:30:02 UTC
By the way who owned Hong Kong, wasnt it the USA an then we turned it over to the china government? The reason I ask is because the british people seem to think they owned it. Everyone I have talked to sem to think that the USA owned it. I really dont know the real facts.
Also I was wondering what the best option for regionals is and a reason and decklist for that reason. I just read a article on BB and he gave a tourny list and % numbers of each deck and the best possible choices that is out there. He seems to think that the Rude tooth is the best option with the soh sb stratagy to accomidate the deck? What should I do for this sat. I need the tech from the tech master.

Reply

Re: The news and what-not! anonymous June 22 2005, 17:21:11 UTC
I'm gaying it with mono-blue, because i dont care at all about the tournament. But if i wanted to qualify i would probably play a fast red deck or tooth and nail. And uh, yeah, Macarthur oversaw japanese government after they surrendered. So i guess america owned Tokyo, but the british probably did own hong kong since they gayed it with collonies in india and indo-china to a lesser extent, so they probably did occupy hong kong for a while, but i wouldnt say they owned it.
-Nick

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


Leave a comment

Up