As you know, dears, I don't go to the movies much. It's not that I don't like them, it's just that I like other things better, and (despite a game effort) it's not feasible to live all possible lives at the same time. Still, we occasionally indulge when it looks as if a movie's going to be significantly better on a large screen than a small one
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
Reply
Disappointing, because I liked *so much* about the film, and I would have loved to have been swept away by the romance too.
I might buy it anyway, just to watch Jude Law's heart break whenever I like. ;)
Reply
fees sorry for Karenin so much more than Anna is a major failure of
focus!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Have you seen the 1998 version of Anna Karenina, out of curiosity? Sean Bean has ruined me for every other Vronsky, and if you want period-accurate costumes, St. Petersburg locations, and a backdrop of Sir Georg Solti and the London Symphony playing more Tchaikovsky than you can shake a stick at, I highly recommend it. It's flawed, yes, and the Levin storyline gets shortchanged, but I really like it as an adaptation.
Reply
See, this is why I hate prescriptive reviews, that privilege the reviewer's taste above all things. Just because I don't like something, I don't think that makes it Bad Art. Ok, I do, but am chary about saying so in public. Because several books I think are unconvincing, thin, badly written, and pointless are wildly popular, well-beloved, and even seriously written about by academics. These books don't speak to me. They do speak to those who love them, and that's wonderful.
This Anna Karenina spoke to me. It may or may not speak to you. But I genuinely think it's a serious enough effort at putting some of what Tolstoy was trying to say in the novel (no film could do justice to its full compexity) to make up your own mind about.
Reply
Leave a comment