Well, if the NYT is anything like The Times (London), I can quite understand this attitude! Far too low-brow, m'dears.
The play probably wasn't very good, but then the musical also had its critics, and was revamped numerous times - and that was ninety years later! I think TSP is just a guilty pleasure, and always has been, from the days when reading 'potboilers' was frowned upon, through to its cult readership today. It will always be one of my favourite books.
Comments 3
(The comment has been removed)
That's what it seems like to me, as well.
With an added hint of "I didn't understand it, so it sucked."
Reply
And who is this "Chaurelin" he writes about? :P
Reply
The play probably wasn't very good, but then the musical also had its critics, and was revamped numerous times - and that was ninety years later! I think TSP is just a guilty pleasure, and always has been, from the days when reading 'potboilers' was frowned upon, through to its cult readership today. It will always be one of my favourite books.
Reply
Leave a comment