(Untitled)

Oct 10, 2008 07:11

this is old news on the blogosphere, but wtf is this bullshit analysis of dworkin?

http://sm-feminist.blogspot.com/2007/08/   dworkin-and-sexual-submission.html

i'm about a quarter through the comments *just finished now*, and am fucking pissed as hell. (aside from joan kelly-- ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 19

dans_la_reine October 10 2008, 13:01:33 UTC
:( I can't tell where your voice begins. Are you quoting people all through your piece or do your views come in somewhere?

Reply

demonista October 11 2008, 02:59:52 UTC
yes! i don't talk outside of the first while and end, eg before "like these gems" and starting again at "and "kink-hatred. i'm not sure to be angry or..."

Reply


tremendous mikiencolor October 10 2008, 14:44:26 UTC
Unbelieveable. When they're not condemning her for hating men it's for loving men and hating women. But that's what scapegoats are for, aren´t they? They're always bad ( ... )

Reply

Re: tremendous demonista October 11 2008, 03:01:32 UTC
I love your analysis. YAY! mikie ;)

I definitely see where you're coming from. Lately, I've found my classic sociological theory, taught by a marxist, more useful to my beliefs as a radfem, than my feminist theory class, which is all about postmodernism! wtf!

Reply

Re: tremendous fierceawakening October 11 2008, 03:51:24 UTC
I think you're assuming that a lot of us on that thread have read postmodernist theory, and I don't think most of us have. I personally know very little about it. Most of the people in there are talking about why we feel attacked and marginalized by Dworkin, rather than dueling theory vs. theory.

I'm not asking you to agree with us or not be angry with us for those comments. I'm just saying that I think you're misunderstanding what made us so mad a year ago. And that is that, well, most of us think that "theory" is generally of limited use, precisely because we find ourselves banging against the wall of, "okay, I see what this theory says, but then over here is my lived experience, which is wildly different."

Reply


born_stubborn October 10 2008, 15:46:45 UTC
Even in my limited wisdom about feminism I've noticed that a vast majority of Andrea Dworkin's critics misinterpret what they don't even understand.

Reply

demonista October 11 2008, 03:01:41 UTC
very true.

Reply


kk0isonlymyname October 10 2008, 17:30:00 UTC
You should use quotation marks. I can't distinguish between the quotes and what you're saying.

Reply

laurelinrain October 10 2008, 20:55:21 UTC
What I'd like to know is who is keeping tally of the 'feminist points'? Is there a grand marker out there, busy with their red pen?

Reply

leanashe October 10 2008, 22:24:52 UTC
Or how radical feminists are even remotely oppressing BDSMers by having an opinion, for that matter!

Reply

demonista October 11 2008, 03:02:51 UTC
omg, you disagree with what i do, you're oppressing me!!!!111eleventy

Reply


tebewilderness October 10 2008, 21:33:21 UTC
Funny how people draw conclusions based on information of which they are ignorant.

Reply

demonista October 11 2008, 03:03:07 UTC
yes, they've a knack for it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up