Change!

Mar 23, 2009 11:54


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

pecosdave March 23 2009, 19:22:41 UTC
Dude, so much I could say there. So much, but this says it all.

Hint I've found when arguing with a Barking Moonbat - make the statement "I find it difficult to argue with Libtards because one of the first things they do is introduce a fallacy, usually an ad hominem but sometimes a different one and they turn the argument into a moving target but we never talk about what we were arguing about to begin with!" Believe it or not I've gotten more than one Moonbat to quit barking first with that tactic, as long as I keep linking to the current fallacy in use when replying. They still fail to address the argument at hand creating a stalemate, but at least it's a stalemate you forced instead of one where you just gave up arguing because of the inability of the other side to stay on topic (like Hillary Clinton answers to difficult questions).

In the mean time, I've been doing some t-shirt shopping.

Reply


slamlander March 23 2009, 22:25:13 UTC
Did you guys catch Obama on Jay Leno the other night?

He wasn't pushing the "You're either with us or against us." Bullshit.

Did you guys forget what the word "Liberal" means? Most of the whacktards you are against, aren't Liberals and (Liberal != Anarchist; Liberal != Socialist either).

Reply

One last point slamlander March 23 2009, 22:27:12 UTC
The US Constitution is a "Liberal" document (Considered the most liberal document of its day).

Reply

Re: One last point pecosdave March 23 2009, 23:18:33 UTC
I agree, it's classically liberal. I'm by definition a classic liberal, however the term has been corrupted so that the word liberal invokes the image of barking moon bats, so the definition of liberal has been shifted to free luncher and the term libertarian has taken its place. It is unfortunate, but those who claim to be liberal have a war against our constitution going on a regular basis. Of the three branches of the government that have failed us, I actually blame the judicial branch the most - not the executive or legislative branch. You expect the executive and legislative branch to make bone headed decisions on occasion, the judicial branch is the one that's supposed to say No! They did this on more than one occasion with FDR - that's why the Blue Eagle I'm so fond of talking about disappeared. However the threat of court packing neutered that branch. Now, since the judicial branch is afraid to act our federal government has expanded its powers into places it doesn't belong, almost all of it being justified by ( ... )

Reply

Re: One last point slamlander March 24 2009, 10:37:33 UTC
It might help if everyone uncorrupts the word. Remind those who consider themselves Liberal just what that word means. Accuse them of not being liberal and that the word "socialist" is NOT a part of Liberty.

Reply


You know, from an outsider's point of view salegamine March 23 2009, 22:40:35 UTC
This just proves you are all as bad as each other.
:)
I mean what was the side that was shouting : "My president, right or wrong", "If you don't like it, move to Canada" and "it's unpatriotic to support the president" not all that long ago?

Reply

Re: You know, from an outsider's point of view desertrat66 March 24 2009, 02:24:00 UTC
Think you missed the point. It's not about sides but individuals.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up