Leave a comment

Comments 27

stillsomehope May 30 2009, 05:48:41 UTC
Several people have been acting out of sorts lately, not just those two mentioned.

Reply

detegoergosum May 30 2009, 06:11:35 UTC
So I am beginning to see. It almost seems as though madness is the rule, here, rather than the exception.

Reply

stillsomehope May 30 2009, 06:13:48 UTC
That's... generally the way it is with spirits. When the dead somehow can't move on, they tend to haunt the place where they died, or the place they have the greatest connection to...

I have some information on the Noh mask, though it isn't any more than what was revealed to us in that article a couple of days ago.

Reply

strikes deleted. ): detegoergosum May 30 2009, 06:21:58 UTC
"Spirits"... a conclusion I'd been hoping to avoid, but that is beginning to seem impossible. An insane world demands insane conclusions, it seems...

I have reviewed that article, myself... but, it seems to be of little use. In all likelihood, the man referred to in it, Taro Yamado, was afflicted in the same way as Bishop-san. If there were something pointing to an original owner...

Reply


i_love_squats May 30 2009, 06:36:46 UTC
His shadow? You mean, we have to worry ghost and the amount of light in a room now?

Reply

he just... stared, for a moment. ): detegoergosum May 30 2009, 06:40:36 UTC
...no. A different sort of Shadow. It would be easiest to think of them as monsters spawned from human minds, though I understand if that is difficult to believe.

Reply

xD I don't blame him. i_love_squats May 30 2009, 06:46:37 UTC
What kind of monsters should we be looking for? The kind with claws? Needles? Tentacle-vines?

Reply

Zack seems to have that effect on people. And, yeah, more staring. ): detegoergosum May 30 2009, 06:52:47 UTC
...they could... be any of those...

...you seem unsettlingly comfortable with this notion, sir. Would I be right to infer that you have had contact with such creatures before?

Reply


[voice;] schaltkreisen May 30 2009, 11:10:35 UTC
Incidents?

Reply

[voice;] detegoergosum May 30 2009, 18:56:20 UTC
Possessions, by all appearances.

Reply


[Voice] unmeinokimagure May 30 2009, 12:29:43 UTC
Relation between the two would be a matter of perception.

Reply

[Voice] detegoergosum May 30 2009, 18:55:21 UTC
As always. However, given the limited evidence, I believe it to be more likely that they are related than not.

Reply

[Voice] unmeinokimagure May 30 2009, 19:09:29 UTC
That... is a very 'closed-case' view.

Reply

[Voice] detegoergosum May 30 2009, 19:16:22 UTC
If you have contradictory evidence, I would be eager to see it. As it is, my theories regarding these incidents are still being developed, and still possess the potential for revision or replacement.

The case is far from closed, Ma'am.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up