..good book.

Dec 14, 2007 18:36

Leave a comment

Comments 8

meeper December 15 2007, 00:43:41 UTC
I heard the book is much better than the movie. I guess the movie is too watered down.

Reply

devotio December 15 2007, 05:09:20 UTC
Way too watered down. I just came back from seeing it. They switched around key points in the ending, avoided the more grim subjects, and totally didn't conclude the story. There definitely was a conclusion in the book, but apparently peoples' eyes just can't handle the full truth of the stories, or so they seem to think. WTF.

Reply

pennhothwen December 15 2007, 16:41:49 UTC
Hate that shit. Hate these old men.

Reply

FIRED OUR FRIENDS devotio December 15 2007, 17:35:06 UTC
Yub. Bullshit. Everything in the movie looked pretty nice though. It wasn't baad, just not the real story. They really could keep the whole flow of it and depth of the characters the way they were meant to be without complicating our feeble minds. They could have kept the length. They also could have kept the story the way it was in the first place without trying to make up reasons for follow up plot points that they wouldn't need to create if they just KEPT IT THE WAY IT FUCKING WAS! It would just be much more worth the $9.50, but they don't want to give us that. They want to pretend that what we read in the book was just in our imagination.

Reply


meeper December 16 2007, 00:16:03 UTC
I read an interview where the director said he wanted it to look more appealing to audiences.
In other words, he was too chicken shit to stick to the real story.

Reply

devotio December 16 2007, 00:37:17 UTC
That sounds about right. Asshole.

Reply


gonzobat13 December 16 2007, 18:36:24 UTC
meow, i wanted to read that and see the movie! hey, how do you put a "U-tube video" on your live journal?

Reply

devotio December 19 2007, 19:59:06 UTC
You have to do it from the youtube site the video is on.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up