(Untitled)

Nov 28, 2006 13:41

i deserved way more on my politics paper than an 86. he said i didn't revise enough? i had TWO ENGLISH MAJORS read my paper, and i read it thrice myself. he would write "no" in certain paragraphs where i was TELLING HIM WHAT THE AUTHORS SAID. it was a book review...most of it was supposed to tell about the authors' actual writings. don't fucking ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 1

e_goldstein November 28 2006, 19:55:30 UTC
Hard to understand? He did go to college, right? Sadly, you've just gotta pander to their delirium if you plan on getting an 'a'...or you just maintain and get out of there with a sub-par grade but with scruples intact.

Mullenbach (intl. relations), for example, believes that it is imperative that we bring the rest of the world up to our industrial and consumptive level by way of globalization of free trade, etc.

Cantrell (Global environment of business) sees the exploitation of labor as a necessary evil, necessary so we can have our $15 jackets. I answered all of the questions as the readings dictated and I got a 'C' on her test. The next time, I just went by the Maxim "what would Cantrell Do?" and I got a 98%.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up